Layered seabed effects on buried pipeline response to ice gouging

被引:1
作者
Ghorbanzadeh, Alireza [1 ]
Dong, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Shiri, Hodjat [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Civil Engn, St John, NF, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ice gouging; Ice-soil-pipeline interaction; Numerical simulation; Large deformation finite element analysis; Layered seabed soil; Pipeline response; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118955
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
In ice gouging analyses, the seabed is often simplified as a uniform material domain, over-looking the potential complexities inherent in layered seabed formations, which are wide-spread in numerous Arctic regions. This study investigates the pipeline response into the distinct seabed configurations, including layered soft over stiff clay, layered stiff over soft clay, and uniformly soft and uniformly stiff compositions, to ice gouging. This was achieved through comprehensive large deformation finite element (LDFE) analysis, employing a Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) algorithm. Incorporation of the strain-rate dependency and strain-softening effects involved the development of a user-defined subroutine and incremental update of the undrained shear strength within the Abaqus software. The pipeline is explicitly incorporated into the model, allowing for a detailed investigation of its response to ice gouging phenomena within these layered seabed scenarios. This research demonstrates that simplifying a layered seabed into a uniform can be misleading. Such an approach can lead to significant errors, potentially overestimating or underestimating pipeline response to ice gouging. By incorporating these complexities, engineers can develop more optimized designs with enhanced safety margins in Arctic environments prone to ice gouging phenomena.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidelines for Constructing Natural Gas and Liquid Hydrocarbon Pipelines through Areas Prone to Landslide and Subsidence Hazards
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Guidelines for the Design of Buried Steel Pipe
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, GUIDELINES SEISMIC D
[4]  
Been K, 2008, 2008 7 INT PIP C, V4, P239
[5]  
Biscontin G, 2001, GEOTECH TEST J, V24, P423
[6]  
C-CORE, 1995, Pressure Ridge Ice Scour Experiment, PRISE: Phase 3-Centrifuge Modelling of Ice Keel Scour: Draft Final Report
[7]  
C -CORE, 2008, Design Options for Offshore Pipelines in the US Beaufort and Chukchi Seas.
[8]  
CSA (Canadian Standards Association), 2015, CSA Z662-15
[9]   EFFECT OF PENETRATION RATE ON STRENGTH OF REMOLDED CLAY AND SAND SAMPLES [J].
DAYAL, U ;
ALLEN, JH .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 12 (03) :336-348
[10]   Combining upper bound and strain path methods for evaluating penetration resistance [J].
Einav, I ;
Randolph, MF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2005, 63 (14) :1991-2016