Nearly optimal state preparation for quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories

被引:6
作者
Kane, Christopher F. [1 ]
Gomes, Niladri [2 ,4 ]
Kreshchuk, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Phys, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[2] Appl Math & Computat Res Div, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Phys Div, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
HAMILTONIAN SIMULATION; COMPUTATION; SCATTERING; ALGORITHM; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.110.012455
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
We present several improvements to the recently developed ground-state preparation algorithm based on the quantum eigenvalue transformation for unitary matrices (QETU), apply this algorithm to a lattice formulation of U(1) gauge theory in (2 + 1) dimensions, as well as propose an alternative application of QETU, a highly efficient preparation of Gaussian distributions. The QETU technique was originally proposed as an algorithm for nearly optimal ground-state preparation and ground-state energy estimation on early fault-tolerant devices. It uses the time-evolution input model, which can potentially overcome the large overall prefactor in the asymptotic gate cost arising in similar algorithms based on the Hamiltonian input model. We present modifications to the original QETU algorithm that significantly reduce the cost for the cases of both exact and Trotterized implementation of the time evolution circuit. We use QETU to prepare the ground state of a U(1) lattice gauge theory in two spatial dimensions, explore the dependence of computational resources on the desired precision and system parameters, and discuss the applicability of our results to general lattice gauge theories. We also demonstrate how the QETU technique can be utilized for preparing Gaussian distributions and wave packets in a way which outperforms existing algorithms for as little as nq >= 2-5 qubits.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 148 条
[51]   An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer [J].
Grimsley, Harper R. ;
Economou, Sophia E. ;
Barnes, Edwin ;
Mayhall, Nicholas J. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[52]   Primitive quantum gates for an SU(2) discrete subgroup: Binary octahedral [J].
Gustafson, Erik J. ;
Lamm, Henry ;
Lovelace, Felicity .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 109 (05)
[53]   QUANTUM ALGORITHM FOR SIMULATING REAL TIME EVOLUTION OF LATTICE HAMILTONIANS [J].
Haah, Jeongwan ;
Hastings, Matthew B. ;
Kothari, Robin ;
Low, Guang Hao .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2023, 52 (06) :250-284
[54]   A resource efficient approach for quantum and classical simulations of gauge theories in particle physics [J].
Haase, Jan F. ;
Dellantonio, Luca ;
Celi, Alessio ;
Paulson, Danny ;
Kan, Angus ;
Jansen, Karl ;
Muschik, Christine A. .
QUANTUM, 2021, 5
[55]   Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers [J].
Hackett, Daniel C. ;
Howe, Kiel ;
Hughes, Ciaran ;
Jay, William ;
Neil, Ethan T. ;
Simone, James N. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2019, 99 (06)
[56]   Gauge protection in non-abelian lattice gauge theories [J].
Halimeh, Jad C. ;
Lang, Haifeng ;
Hauke, Philipp .
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2022, 24 (03)
[57]   Gauge-Symmetry Protection Using Single-Body Terms [J].
Halimeh, Jad C. ;
Lang, Haifeng ;
Mildenberger, Julius ;
Jiang, Zhang ;
Hauke, Philipp .
PRX QUANTUM, 2021, 2 (04)
[58]   Reliability of Lattice Gauge Theories [J].
Halimeh, Jad C. ;
Hauke, Philipp .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2020, 125 (03)
[59]  
Hamed Moosavian Ali, 2018, Physical Review A, V98, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012332
[60]  
Moosavian AH, 2019, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1911.03505, 10.48550/arXiv.1911.03505, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1911.03505]