Does Socially Responsible Investing Outperform Conventional Investing? A Cross-Country Perspective

被引:0
作者
Hasan, Iram [1 ]
Singh, Shveta [1 ]
Kashiramka, Smita [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol IIT Delhi, Dept Management Studies, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; COVID-19; ESG; Financial performance; Socially responsible investing; Sustainability; C5; G01; G12; G20; M14; MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; INVESTMENT; RISK; SRI; PERSISTENCE; STRATEGIES; SELECTION; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1007/s10690-024-09489-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given the growing significance of socially responsible investing (SRI), the study aims to empirically examine the financial performance of socially responsible indices of India, China, the United States (US), and the United Kingdom (UK) vis-& agrave;-vis their respective market benchmark indices. The study uses various risk-adjusted performance measures such as Sharpe ratio, Jensen alpha, Treynor ratio, Information ratio, Modified Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, and Omega ratio to analyze the performance of SRI indices. The period of analysis extends from January 2018 to December 2021. The study performs various sub-period analyses including a crisis period analysis to assess the impact of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) crisis on the performance of select indices. Statistical tests such as the paired t-test and Levene's F test are applied to examine the homogeneity of means and variances of sample indices. Robustness checks involve calculating performance metrics across varying sample sizes using a growing window procedure. The results highlight the outperformance of SRI indices over market benchmarks in India, the US, and the UK, suggesting that investors do not have to forgo financial performance to address their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns. There is no statistically significant outcome observed for SRI performance in China. Empirical evidence from the crisis period analysis indicates that SRI can offer investors a hedge against market volatility. Overall, the findings suggest that there is no homogenous or universal outcome of SRI but rather varies depending on geographic region, study period, current market conditions, and extent of SRI adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:50
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: A global perspective
    Hill, Ronald Paul
    Ainscough, Thomas
    Shank, Todd
    Manullang, Daryl
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 70 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [22] Sustainable development and socially responsible finance and investing
    Scholtens, Bert
    Cerin, Pontus
    Hassel, Lars
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 16 (03) : 137 - 140
  • [23] Does It Pay to Be Responsible? The Performance of ESG Investing in China
    Zhang, Xiaoke
    Zhao, Xuankai
    He, Yu
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2022, 58 (11) : 3048 - 3075
  • [24] Financial networks with socially responsible investing
    Qiang Q.
    Ke K.
    Hu Y.
    Computational Management Science, 2013, 10 (2-3) : 231 - 252
  • [25] The role of the media in socially responsible investing
    Lei, Shan
    Zhang, Yafei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING, 2020, 38 (04) : 823 - 841
  • [26] Socially Responsible Investing in the United States
    Steve Schueth
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2003, 43 : 189 - 194
  • [27] Socially responsible investing in hedge funds
    Filbeck G.
    Krause T.A.
    Reis L.
    Journal of Asset Management, 2016, 17 (6) : 408 - 421
  • [28] Socially responsible investing in the United States
    Schueth, S
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 43 (03) : 189 - 194
  • [29] THE CORPORATE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTING CRITERIA IN PRIVATE EQUITY: RELEVANCE AND BUSINESS IMPACT
    Vega Vidal, Jose Antonio
    Fernandez Fernandez, Jose Luis
    STRATEGICA: LOCAL VERSUS GLOBAL, 2015, : 599 - 608
  • [30] Does Relative Performance of Socially Responsible Investing Increase With Financial Risk?
    Sliwinski, Pawel
    Lobza, Maciej
    PROBLEMY ZARZADZANIA-MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2019, 17 (03): : 212 - 228