Artificial intelligence in medical education: Typologies and ethical approaches

被引:2
作者
Pregowska, Agnieszka [1 ]
Perkins, Mark [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Polish Acad Sci, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Coll Prometricum, Sopot, Poland
[3] Royal Soc Arts, London, England
关键词
artificial intelligence typology; artificial intelligence in medicine; ethics; bioethics; medical education; health professional education; HEALTH-CARE; ROBOTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.2478/ebce-2024-0004
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has an increasing role to play in medical education and has great potential to revolutionize health professional education systems overall. However, this is accompanied by substantial questions concerning technical and ethical risks which are of particular importance because the quality of medical education has a direct effect on physical and psychological health and wellbeing. This article establishes an overarching distinction of AI across two typological dimensions, functional and humanistic. As indispensable foundations, these are then related to medical practice overall, and forms of implementation with examples are described in both general and medical education. Increasingly, the conditions for successful medical education will depend on an understanding of AI and the ethical issues surrounding its implementation, as well as the formulation of appropriate guidelines by regulatory and other authorities. Within that discussion, the limits of both narrow or Routine AI (RAI) and artificial general intelligence or Decision AI (DAI) are examined particularly in view of the ethical need for Trustworthy AI (TAI) as part of the humanistic dimension. All stakeholders, from patients to medical practitioners, managers, and institutions, need to be able to trust AI, and loss of confidence could be catastrophic in some cases.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 113
页数:18
相关论文
共 117 条
[21]   Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments [J].
Chouldechova, Alexandra .
BIG DATA, 2017, 5 (02) :153-163
[22]  
Chromik M., 2020, Exss-atec@ iui
[23]   Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles [J].
Chu, Hui-Chun ;
Hwang, Gwo-Haur ;
Tu, Yun-Fang ;
Yang, Kai-Hsiang .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 38 (03) :22-42
[24]  
Chui M., 2023, STATE AI 2023 GENERA
[25]   Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability [J].
Coeckelbergh, Mark .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2020, 26 (04) :2051-2068
[26]   A historical perspective of explainable Artificial Intelligence [J].
Confalonieri, Roberto ;
Coba, Ludovik ;
Wagner, Benedikt ;
Besold, Tarek R. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2021, 11 (01)
[27]   May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?-The Case of ChatGPT [J].
Corsello, Antonio ;
Santangelo, Andrea .
CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (04)
[28]  
Creely E., 2022, CREATIVE PROVOCATION, V7, P35, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-14549-03
[29]   Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field [J].
Crompton, Helen ;
Burke, Diane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 20 (01)
[30]   Assessing the Capability of ChatGPT in Answering First- and Second-Order Knowledge Questions on Microbiology as per Competency- Based Medical Education Curriculum [J].
Das, Dipmala ;
Kumar, Nikhil ;
Longjam, Langamba Angom ;
Sinha, Ranwir ;
Roy, Asitava Deb ;
Mondal, Himel ;
Gupta, Pratima .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)