Toward cross-subject and cross-session generalization in EEG-based emotion recognition: Systematic review, taxonomy, and methods

被引:4
作者
Apicella, Andrea [1 ]
Arpaia, Pasquale [1 ,4 ]
D'Errico, Giovanni [2 ]
Marocco, Davide [3 ]
Mastrati, Giovanna [1 ]
Moccaldi, Nicola [1 ]
Prevete, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Via Claudio 21, I-80138 Naples, Italy
[2] Polytech Univ Turin, Dept Appl Sci & Technol, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Nat & Artificial Cognit Lab, I-80133 Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Naples Federico II, Interdept Res Ctr Hlth Management & Innovat Health, I-80138 Naples, Italy
关键词
BCI; EEG; Emotion recognition; Machine learning; Transfer learning; Domain adaptation; Systematic review; Generalization; DOMAIN FEATURES; CLASSIFICATION; DATABASE; MOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128354
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A systematic review on machine-learning strategies for improving generalization in electroencephalographybased emotion classification was realized. In particular, cross-subject and cross-session generalization was focused. In this context, the non-stationarity of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals is a critical issue and can lead to the Dataset Shift problem. Several architectures and methods have been proposed to address this issue, mainly based on transfer learning methods. In this review, 449 papers were retrieved from the Scopus, , IEEE Xplore and PubMed databases through a search query focusing on modern machine learning techniques for generalization in EEG-based emotion assessment. Among these papers, 79 were found eligible based on their relevance to the problem. Studies lacking a specific cross-subject or cross-session validation strategy, or making use of other biosignals as support were excluded. On the basis of the selected papers' analysis, a taxonomy of the studies employing Machine Learning (ML) methods was proposed, together with a brief discussion of the different ML approaches involved. The studies reporting the best results in terms of average classification accuracy were identified, supporting that transfer learning methods seem to perform better than other approaches. A discussion is proposed on the impact of (i) the emotion theoretical models and (ii) psychological screening of the experimental sample on the classifier performances.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 224 条
[1]   A Long Short Term Memory Deep Learning Network for the Classification of Negative Emotions Using EEG Signals [J].
Acharya, Divya ;
Goel, Shivani ;
Bhardwaj, Harshit ;
Sakaile, Aditi ;
Bhardwaj, Arpit .
2020 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2020,
[2]   American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 2: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature [J].
Acharya, Jayant N. ;
Hani, Abeer ;
Cheek, Janna ;
Thirumala, Partha ;
Tsuchida, Tammy N. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (04) :308-311
[3]  
Ajakan H, 2015, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1412.4446, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1412.4446]
[4]   Emotions Recognition Using EEG Signals: A Survey [J].
Alarcao, Soraia M. ;
Fonseca, Manuel J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING, 2019, 10 (03) :374-393
[5]   Deep Learning for EEG-Based Preference Classification in Neuromarketing [J].
Aldayel, Mashael ;
Ykhlef, Mourad ;
Al-Nafjan, Abeer .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (04)
[6]   Automatic subject-specific spatiotemporal feature selection for subject-independent affective BCI [J].
Almarri, Badar ;
Rajasekaran, Sanguthevar ;
Huang, Chun-Hsi .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08)
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ICML DEEP LEARN WORK
[9]  
Apicella A., 2022, 2022 IEEE INT INSTR, P1
[10]   On the effects of data normalization for domain adaptation on EEG data [J].
Apicella, Andrea ;
Isgro, Francesco ;
Pollastro, Andrea ;
Prevete, Roberto .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 123