Speech Recognition and Subjective Hearing Abilities for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users With Unilateral Hearing Loss

被引:2
作者
Dillon, Margaret T. [1 ]
Buss, Emily [1 ]
Thompson, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Richter, Margaret E. [1 ]
Davis, Amanda G. [1 ]
Overton, Andrea B. [2 ]
Rooth, Meredith A. [1 ]
Canfarotta, Michael W. [1 ]
Selleck, A. Morgan [1 ]
Dedmon, Matthew M. [1 ]
Brown, Kevin D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] UNC Hlth, Dept Audiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Asymmetric hearing loss; Binaural hearing; Cochlear implant; Cochlear implantation; Indications; Quality of life; Single-sided deafness; Speech in noise; SINGLE-SIDED DEAFNESS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; AID SETTINGS; OUTCOMES; MASKING; PERCEPTION; TINNITUS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000004281
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Some cochlear implant (CI) recipients with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) have functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear, warranting the fitting of an ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device. The present study assessed speech recognition and subjective hearing abilities over time for EAS users with UHL. Study Design Prospective, repeated-measures. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Adult CI recipients with normal-to-moderate low-frequency acoustic thresholds in the implanted ear and a contralateral pure-tone average (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz) <= 25 dB HL. Main Outcome Measures Participants were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-activation. Speech recognition for the affected ear was evaluated with CNC words in quiet. Masked speech recognition in the bilateral condition was evaluated with AzBio sentences in a 10-talker masker (0 dB SNR) for three spatial configurations: target from the front and masker either colocated with the target or presented 90 degrees toward the affected or contralateral ear. Responses to the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale subscales were used to assess subjective hearing abilities. Results Participants experienced significant improvements in CNC scores (F-(3,F-13) = 14.90, p < 0.001), and masked speech recognition in the colocated (F-(3,F-11) = 3.79, p = 0.043) and masker toward the contralateral ear (F-(3,F-11) = 4.75, p = 0.023) configurations. They also reported significantly better abilities on the Speech Hearing (F-(3,F-13) = 5.19, p = 0.014) and Spatial Hearing (F-(3,F-13) = 10.22, p = 0.001) subscales. ConclusionsAdults with UHL and functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear experience significant improvements in speech recognition and subjective hearing abilities within the initial months of EAS use as compared with preoperative performance and perceptions.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1011
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Prevalence of potential candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation implant in a hearing-impaired population [J].
Saito, Kazuya ;
Fujita, Takeshi ;
Osaki, Yasuhiro ;
Koyama, Hajime ;
Shiraishi, Ko ;
Kobayashi, Takaaki ;
Sato, Mitsuo ;
Seo, Toru ;
Doi, Katsumi .
AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2020, 47 (02) :198-202
[32]   Effects of the Configuration of Hearing Loss on Consonant Perception between Simulated Bimodal and Electric Acoustic Stimulation Hearing [J].
Yoon, Yang-Soo ;
Whitaker, George ;
Lee, Yune S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (08) :521-527
[33]   Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing [J].
Imsiecke, Marina ;
Buechner, Andreas ;
Lenarz, Thomas ;
Nogueira, Waldo .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 386
[34]   Long-term Follow-up of Hearing Preservation in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Patients [J].
Mertens, Griet ;
Punte, Andrea Kleine ;
Cochet, Ellen ;
De Bodt, Marc ;
Van de Heyning, Paul .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (10) :1765-1772
[35]   Preliminary speech recognition results after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral hearing loss: A case series [J].
Stelzig Y. ;
Jacob R. ;
Mueller J. .
Journal of Medical Case Reports, 5 (1)
[36]   Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: Potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow [J].
Nittrouer, Susan ;
Caldwell-Tarr, Amanda ;
Tarr, Eric ;
Lowenstein, Joanna H. ;
Rice, Caitlin ;
Moberly, Aaron C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2013, 52 (08) :513-525
[37]   Effects of Simulated and Profound Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Recognition of Speech in Competing Speech [J].
Asp, Filip ;
Reinfeldt, Sabine .
EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 (02) :411-419
[38]   Electric-acoustic interaction measurements in cochlear-implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing using electrocochleography [J].
Krueger, Benjamin ;
Buechner, Andreas ;
Lenarz, Thomas ;
Nogueira, Waldo .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 147 (01) :350-363
[39]   Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss [J].
Griffin, Amanda M. ;
Poissant, Sarah F. ;
Freyman, Richard L. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (04) :887-904
[40]   Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation [J].
Helbig, Silke ;
Adel, Youssef ;
Leinung, Martin ;
Stoever, Timo ;
Baumann, Uwe ;
Weissgerber, Tobias .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (07) :834-841