Speech Recognition and Subjective Hearing Abilities for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users With Unilateral Hearing Loss

被引:0
作者
Dillon, Margaret T. [1 ]
Buss, Emily [1 ]
Thompson, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Richter, Margaret E. [1 ]
Davis, Amanda G. [1 ]
Overton, Andrea B. [2 ]
Rooth, Meredith A. [1 ]
Canfarotta, Michael W. [1 ]
Selleck, A. Morgan [1 ]
Dedmon, Matthew M. [1 ]
Brown, Kevin D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] UNC Hlth, Dept Audiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Asymmetric hearing loss; Binaural hearing; Cochlear implant; Cochlear implantation; Indications; Quality of life; Single-sided deafness; Speech in noise; SINGLE-SIDED DEAFNESS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; AID SETTINGS; OUTCOMES; MASKING; PERCEPTION; TINNITUS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000004281
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Some cochlear implant (CI) recipients with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) have functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear, warranting the fitting of an ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device. The present study assessed speech recognition and subjective hearing abilities over time for EAS users with UHL. Study Design Prospective, repeated-measures. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Adult CI recipients with normal-to-moderate low-frequency acoustic thresholds in the implanted ear and a contralateral pure-tone average (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz) <= 25 dB HL. Main Outcome Measures Participants were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-activation. Speech recognition for the affected ear was evaluated with CNC words in quiet. Masked speech recognition in the bilateral condition was evaluated with AzBio sentences in a 10-talker masker (0 dB SNR) for three spatial configurations: target from the front and masker either colocated with the target or presented 90 degrees toward the affected or contralateral ear. Responses to the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale subscales were used to assess subjective hearing abilities. Results Participants experienced significant improvements in CNC scores (F-(3,F-13) = 14.90, p < 0.001), and masked speech recognition in the colocated (F-(3,F-11) = 3.79, p = 0.043) and masker toward the contralateral ear (F-(3,F-11) = 4.75, p = 0.023) configurations. They also reported significantly better abilities on the Speech Hearing (F-(3,F-13) = 5.19, p = 0.014) and Spatial Hearing (F-(3,F-13) = 10.22, p = 0.001) subscales. ConclusionsAdults with UHL and functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear experience significant improvements in speech recognition and subjective hearing abilities within the initial months of EAS use as compared with preoperative performance and perceptions.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1011
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss
    Bost, Tim J. M.
    Versfeld, Niek J.
    Goverts, S. Theo
    EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (04) : 1025 - 1034
  • [22] Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Unilateral Hearing Loss: Initial Localization Abilities
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Buss, Emily
    Anderson, Meredith L.
    King, English R.
    Deres, Ellen J.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (05) : 611 - 619
  • [23] Influence of Electric Frequency-to-Place Mismatches on the Early Speech Recognition Outcomes for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Canfarotta, Michael W.
    Buss, Emily
    Rooth, Meredith A.
    Richter, Margaret E.
    Overton, Andrea B.
    Roth, Noelle E.
    Dillon, Sarah M.
    Raymond, Jenna H.
    Young, Allison
    Pearson, Adrienne C.
    Davis, Amanda G.
    Dedmon, Matthew M.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    O'Connell, Brendan P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2023, 32 (01) : 251 - 260
  • [24] Factors Predicting Postoperative Unilateral and Bilateral Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients with Acoustic Hearing
    Plant, Kerrie
    McDermott, Hugh
    van Hoesel, Richard
    Dawson, Pamela
    Cowan, Robert
    EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 (02) : 153 - 163
  • [25] Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy
    Firszt, Jill B.
    Reeder, Ruth M.
    Holden, Laura K.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (02) : 159 - 173
  • [26] The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Zeman, Annette
    Neukam, Jonathan
    Wang, Binhuan
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (03) : 621 - 635
  • [27] Quantification of Speech-in-Noise and Sound Localisation Abilities in Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss and Comparison to Normal Hearing Peers
    Reeder, Ruth M.
    Cadieux, Jamie
    Firszt, Jill B.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2015, 20 : 31 - 37
  • [28] Electric-acoustic stimulation with longer electrodes for potential deterioration in low-frequency hearing
    Yoshimura, Hidekane
    Moteki, Hideaki
    Nishio, Shin-ya
    Usami, Shin-ichi
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2020, 140 (08) : 632 - 638
  • [29] Prevalence of potential candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation implant in a hearing-impaired population
    Saito, Kazuya
    Fujita, Takeshi
    Osaki, Yasuhiro
    Koyama, Hajime
    Shiraishi, Ko
    Kobayashi, Takaaki
    Sato, Mitsuo
    Seo, Toru
    Doi, Katsumi
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2020, 47 (02) : 198 - 202
  • [30] Effects of the Configuration of Hearing Loss on Consonant Perception between Simulated Bimodal and Electric Acoustic Stimulation Hearing
    Yoon, Yang-Soo
    Whitaker, George
    Lee, Yune S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (08) : 521 - 527