Speech Recognition and Subjective Hearing Abilities for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users With Unilateral Hearing Loss

被引:0
|
作者
Dillon, Margaret T. [1 ]
Buss, Emily [1 ]
Thompson, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Richter, Margaret E. [1 ]
Davis, Amanda G. [1 ]
Overton, Andrea B. [2 ]
Rooth, Meredith A. [1 ]
Canfarotta, Michael W. [1 ]
Selleck, A. Morgan [1 ]
Dedmon, Matthew M. [1 ]
Brown, Kevin D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] UNC Hlth, Dept Audiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Asymmetric hearing loss; Binaural hearing; Cochlear implant; Cochlear implantation; Indications; Quality of life; Single-sided deafness; Speech in noise; SINGLE-SIDED DEAFNESS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; AID SETTINGS; OUTCOMES; MASKING; PERCEPTION; TINNITUS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000004281
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Some cochlear implant (CI) recipients with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) have functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear, warranting the fitting of an ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device. The present study assessed speech recognition and subjective hearing abilities over time for EAS users with UHL. Study Design Prospective, repeated-measures. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Adult CI recipients with normal-to-moderate low-frequency acoustic thresholds in the implanted ear and a contralateral pure-tone average (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz) <= 25 dB HL. Main Outcome Measures Participants were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-activation. Speech recognition for the affected ear was evaluated with CNC words in quiet. Masked speech recognition in the bilateral condition was evaluated with AzBio sentences in a 10-talker masker (0 dB SNR) for three spatial configurations: target from the front and masker either colocated with the target or presented 90 degrees toward the affected or contralateral ear. Responses to the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale subscales were used to assess subjective hearing abilities. Results Participants experienced significant improvements in CNC scores (F-(3,F-13) = 14.90, p < 0.001), and masked speech recognition in the colocated (F-(3,F-11) = 3.79, p = 0.043) and masker toward the contralateral ear (F-(3,F-11) = 4.75, p = 0.023) configurations. They also reported significantly better abilities on the Speech Hearing (F-(3,F-13) = 5.19, p = 0.014) and Spatial Hearing (F-(3,F-13) = 10.22, p = 0.001) subscales. ConclusionsAdults with UHL and functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear experience significant improvements in speech recognition and subjective hearing abilities within the initial months of EAS use as compared with preoperative performance and perceptions.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1011
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception
    Thompson, J.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Bucker, Andrea L.
    King, English R.
    Pillsbury, Harold C., III
    Brown, Kevin D.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (02) : E94 - E98
  • [2] Effects of Hearing Aid Settings for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Buss, Emily
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Adunka, Marcia C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [3] Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception Outcomes With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After 12 Months of Listening Experience
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Adunka, Marcia C.
    King, English R.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2013, 123 (10) : 2509 - 2515
  • [4] Cochlear Implantation for Unilateral and Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Long-Term Subjective Benefit
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Lopez, Erin M.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Rooth, Meredith A.
    Richter, Margaret E.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2023, 133 (10) : 2792 - 2797
  • [5] Incidence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in the Functional Acoustic Hearing Region and the Influence on Speech Recognition with Electric-Acoustic Stimulation
    Nix, Evan P.
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    Dedmon, Matthew M.
    Selleck, A. Morgan
    Overton, Andrea B.
    Canfarotta, Michael W.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 44 (10) : 1004 - 1010
  • [6] Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation
    Rader, T.
    Bohnert, A.
    Matthias, C.
    Koutsimpelas, D.
    Kainz, M-A.
    Strieth, S.
    HNO, 2018, 66 : S56 - S62
  • [7] Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing
    Tejani, Viral D.
    Yang, Hyejin
    Kim, Jeong-Seo
    Hernandez, Helin
    Oleson, Jacob J.
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Abbas, Paul J.
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01): : 95 - 118
  • [8] Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system -: New technology for severe hearing loss
    von Ilberg, C
    Kiefer, J
    Tillein, J
    Pfenningdorff, T
    Hartmann, R
    Stürzebecher, E
    Klinke, R
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 1999, 61 (06): : 334 - 340
  • [9] The Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Speech Understanding, Subjective Hearing Performance, and Tinnitus Perception in Patients with Unilateral Severe to Profound Hearing Loss
    Tavora-Vieira, Dayse
    Marino, Roberta
    Acharya, Aanand
    Rajan, Gunesh P.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (03) : 430 - 436
  • [10] Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Subjective Benefit, Word Recognition, and Spatial Hearing
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Buss, Emily
    Rooth, Meredith A.
    King, English R.
    McCarthy, Sarah A.
    Bucker, Andrea L.
    Deres, Ellen J.
    Richter, Margaret E.
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Canfarotta, Michael W.
    O'Connell, Brendan P.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2020, 24