Litigation and information effects on private sales of securities

被引:0
作者
Bayar, Onur [1 ]
Floros, Ioannis, V [2 ]
Liu, Yini [3 ]
Mao, Juan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas San Antonio, Finance, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Milwaukee, Finance, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Finance, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[4] Univ Texas San Antonio, Accounting, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
关键词
Law and finance; Information effects; Private Investments in Public Equity (PIPEs); Private placements; Mitigation action; SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION; INVESTOR IDENTITY; CONTRACT TERMS; FIRM VALUE; MATTER; RISK; RETURNS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102628
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We analyze PIPE (Private Investments in Public Equity) transactions in which the issuer experienced class action lawsuits. We explain the associated information effects measured by the announcement wealth effects and the discounts. Using a comprehensive, hand-gathered dataset, we show that the more severely litigated PIPEs are associated with higher announcement wealth effects and higher levels of discounts. We find that the issuer's voluntary disclosure positively influences PIPE information effects particularly when coupled with auditor changes. We report that certain mitigation actions affect the pricing of PIPEs along with their associated wealth effects while facing ongoing litigation. We posit that confidentiality in privately negotiated securities is the key in litigated transactions as issuers efficiently share the operational details of mitigation efforts. PIPE transactions are not necessarily costlier funding venues even when securities class action lawsuits are ongoing compared to the PIPE transactions that did not experience any prior litigation action.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Does litigation contingency disclosure in corporate filings matter? Evidence from securities class action lawsuits [J].
De Vides, Zhanel ;
Hwang, Hyoseok .
MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2024, 50 (12) :2154-2172
[32]   Institutional Activism Through Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of Public Pension Fund Participation in Securities Class Actions [J].
Perino, Michael .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2012, 9 (02) :368-392
[33]   Cyclical effects of advertising on hotel sales, risk and return [J].
Chen, Ming-Hsiang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2015, 46 :169-179
[34]   Effects of litigation under the Endangered Species Act on forest firm values [J].
Sun, Changyou ;
Liao, Xianchun .
JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2011, 17 (04) :388-398
[35]   Private information in currency markets [J].
Michaelides, Alexander ;
Milidonis, Andreas ;
Nishiotis, George P. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 131 (03) :643-665
[36]   Jurisdictional Effects in M&A Litigation [J].
Krishnan, C. N. V. ;
Masulis, Ronald W. ;
Thomas, Randall S. ;
Thompson, Robert B. .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2014, 11 (01) :132-158
[37]   The Effects of Independent Director Litigation Risk [J].
Donelson, Dain C. ;
Tori, Elizabeth ;
Yust, Christopher G. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 39 (02) :982-1022
[38]   The effect of ex ante litigation risk on corporate fraud: Evidence from securities class action act in Korea* [J].
Choi, Seungho ;
Gam, Yong Kyu ;
Kim, Yong Hyuck ;
Shin, Hojong .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 64
[39]   Forward-looking information on growth and uncertainty implied by derivative securities: Evidence from an emerging market [J].
Yen, Yu-Min .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2019, 62 :240-266
[40]   Valuation Effects for Asset Sales [J].
Wiley, Jonathan A. ;
Cline, Brandon N. ;
Fu, Xudong ;
Tang, Tian .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 41 (03) :103-120