What makes professional teacher development in universities effective? Lessons from an international systematised review

被引:1
作者
Smith, Bethany [1 ]
Wyness, Lynne [2 ]
机构
[1] Hartpury Univ, HE Sport, Gloucester GL19 3BE, England
[2] Plymouth Marjon Univ, Sch Educ, Plymouth, Devon, England
关键词
University teacher development; professional development; systematised review; engagement and motivation; pedagogy; PEER OBSERVATION; SELF-EFFICACY; SCHOLARSHIP; EDUCATION; IDENTITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/19415257.2024.2386666
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The professional development landscape for university teachers has shifted from focusing solely on self-development, to maximising engagement with activities that are developmental, on-going and systematic. A systematised literature review reveals the composition, design and purpose of professional development for teachers within university settings is diverse. Drawing on literature from an international context, this review offers a broader perspective on what makes professional development effective, widening our understanding to include what teaching professionals themselves value and prioritise. Using 16 peer-reviewed articles between 2012 and 2022, the diversity of professional development is explored across 13 different international perspectives. The findings show that pedagogical collaboration, in the form of peer review teaching and the development of communities, is valued amongst university teachers due to their intimate dialogic nature. Factors such as relevance, structure and voluntary participation were themes discussed influencing the engagement and motivation for university teachers to self-develop and attend professional development. Finally, we acknowledge the variability between international universities, such as resources and cultural differences, and how this might influence the perception of professional development amongst university teachers.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
Alhojailan M.I., 2012, AC C P WEI INT EUR Z
[2]  
Alma Economics, 2022, The teaching excellence framework-analysis of consultation responses, P1
[3]  
Archer M. S., 2000, Being human: The problem of agency
[4]  
Archer Margaret., 2007, CONTRIBUTIONS SOCIAL, P17
[5]  
Archer Margaret S., 1995, REALIST SOCIAL THEOR
[6]  
Armstrong Thomas., 2010, Neurodiversity: Discovering the extraordinary gifts of autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other brain differences
[7]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI, DOI [10.1891/08898391.13.2.158, DOI 10.1891/08898391.13.2.158]
[8]  
Barley Z. A., 2007, Journal of Research in Rural Education, V22, P1
[9]  
Barnett Adrian G, 2019, F1000Res, V8, P583, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.18453.2
[10]  
Baskerville D., 2009, Cambridge Journal of Education, V39, P205, DOI DOI 10.1080/03057640902902260