Consistency of CSCO AI with Multidisciplinary Clinical Decision-Making Teams in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

被引:0
作者
Xu, Weimin [1 ]
Wang, Xinyu [2 ]
Yang, Lei [2 ]
Meng, Muzi [3 ,4 ]
Sun, Chenyu [1 ]
Li, Wanwan [1 ]
Li, Jia [1 ]
Zheng, Lu [1 ]
Tang, Tong [1 ]
Jia, WenJun [1 ]
Chen, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Thyroid & Breast Surg, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] AnHui Med Univ, Sch Clin Med 2, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Amer Univ Caribbean, Sch Med, Sint Maarten, Netherlands
[4] BronxCare Hlth Syst, Gen Surg, New York, NY USA
来源
BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY | 2024年 / 16卷
关键词
Chinese Society of clinical oncology artificial intelligence system; CSCO AI; breast cancer; multi-disciplinary treatment; MDT; consistency; CHINA;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S419433
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Artificial Intelligence System (CSCO AI) serves as a clinical decision support system developed utilizing Chinese breast cancer data. Our study delved into the congruence between breast cancer treatment recommendations provided by CSCO AI and their practical application in clinical settings. Methods: A retrospective analysis encompassed 537 breast cancer patients treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between January 2017 and December 2022. Proficient senior oncology researchers manually input patient data into the CSCO AI system. "Consistent" and "Inconsistent" treatment categories were defined by aligning our treatment protocols with the classification system in the CSCO AI recommendations. Cases that initially showed inconsistency underwent a second evaluation by the Multi-Disciplinary Treatment (MDT) team at the hospital. Concordance was achieved when MDTs' treatment suggestions were in the 'Consistent' categories. Results: An impressive 80.4% concurrence was observed between actual treatment protocols and CSCO AI recommendations across all breast cancer patients. Notably, the alignment was markedly higher for stage I (85.02%) and stage III (88.46%) patients in contrast to stage II patients (76.06%, P=0.023). Moreover, there was a significant concordance between invasive ductal carcinoma and lobular carcinoma (88.46%). Interestingly, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibited a high concordance rate (87.50%) compared to other molecular subtypes. When contrasting MDT-recommended treatments with CSCO AI decisions, an overall 92.4% agreement was established. Furthermore, a logistic multivariate analysis highlighted the statistical significance of age, menstrual status, tumor type, molecular subtype, tumor size, and TNM stage in influencing consistency. Conclusion: In the realm of breast cancer treatment, the alignment between recommendations offered by CSCO AI and those from MDT is predominant. CSCO AI can be a useful tool for breast cancer treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 422
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Delayed Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Breast Cancer Among Chinese Women An Integrative Literature Review
    An, Jinghua
    Hershberger, Patricia E. E.
    Ferrans, Carol Estwing
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2023, 46 (03) : 217 - 232
  • [2] Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020
    Cao, Wei
    Chen, Hong-Da
    Yu, Yi-Wen
    Li, Ni
    Chen, Wan-Qing
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (07) : 783 - 791
  • [3] Psychological Benefits of a Sport-Based Program for Female Cancer Survivors: The Role of Social Connections
    Durosini, Ilaria
    Triberti, Stefano
    Sebri, Valeria
    Giudice, Alice Viola
    Guiddi, Paolo
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [4] Breast cancer in China
    Fan, Lei
    Strasser-Weippl, Kathrin
    Li, Jun-Jie
    St Louis, Jessica
    Finkelstein, Dianne M.
    Yu, Ke-Da
    Chen, Wan-Qing
    Shao, Zhi-Ming
    Goss, Paul E.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (07) : E279 - E289
  • [5] Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022
    Gradishar, William J.
    Moran, Meena S.
    Abraham, Jame
    Aft, Rebecca
    Agnese, Doreen
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Anderson, Bethany
    Burstein, Harold J.
    Chew, Helen
    Dang, Chau
    Elias, Anthony D.
    Giordano, Sharon H.
    Goetz, Matthew P.
    Goldstein, Lori J.
    Hurvitz, Sara A.
    Isakoff, Steven J.
    Jankowitz, Rachel C.
    Javid, Sara H.
    Krishnamurthy, Jairam
    Leitch, Marilyn
    Lyons, Janice
    Mortimer, Joanne
    Patel, Sameer A.
    Pierce, Lori J.
    Rosenberger, Laura H.
    Rugo, Hope S.
    Sitapati, Amy
    Smith, Karen Lisa
    Smith, Mary Lou
    Soliman, Hatem
    Stringer-Reasor, Erica M.
    Telli, Melinda L.
    Ward, John H.
    Wisinski, Kari B.
    Young, Jessica S.
    Burns, Jennifer
    Kumar, Rashmi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2022, 20 (06): : 691 - 722
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence-Driven Oncology Clinical Decision Support System for Multidisciplinary Teams
    Lee, Kyounga
    Lee, Seon Heui
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (17) : 1 - 12
  • [7] Li J B, 2020, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, V100, P411, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2020.06.003
  • [8] Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC) guidelines in 2022: stratification and classification
    Li, Jianbin
    Jiang, Zefei
    [J]. CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (06) : 769 - 773
  • [9] Descriptive epidemiology of breast cancer in China: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence
    Li, Tong
    Mello-Thoms, Claudia
    Brennan, Patrick C.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 159 (03) : 395 - 406
  • [10] Watson for oncology decision system for treatment consistency study in breast cancer
    Liu, Yaobang
    Huo, Xingfa
    Li, Qi
    Li, Yishuang
    Shen, Guoshuang
    Wang, Miaozhou
    Ren, Dengfeng
    Zhao, Fuxing
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhao, Jiuda
    Liu, Xinlan
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (05) : 1649 - 1657