Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study

被引:2
|
作者
Thornton, Madeline [1 ]
Mann, Emily S. [2 ]
Bullington, Brooke W. [3 ]
Hartheimer, Joline [1 ]
Arora, Kavita Shah [4 ]
Allison, Bianca A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 231 McNider Bldg CB 7225 333 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
adolescent; contraceptive counseling; shared decision-making; HEALTH-CARE; YOUNG-ADULTS; BARRIERS; PROVIDER; BIAS; PERSPECTIVES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1111/psrh.12283
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adolescent contraceptive decision-making is influenced by a number of patient and clinician-driven factors. Although the AAP continues to endorse an efficacy-based model of contraceptive counseling, many professional organizations are shifting to a shared decision-making model as the optimal approach for providing unbiased and patient-driven contraceptive counseling. While SDM is intended to reduce the influence of clinician bias, it can exacerbate inequity if a clinician tailors a conversation based on their assumptions of a patient's goals or preferences. In this qualitative study, we explored self-reported contraceptive counseling practices among US-based clinicians who see adolescent patients to assess how these practices create barriers or facilitators to SDM and person-centered contraceptive care. Methods: We interviewed 16 clinicians at the 2022 AAP Annual Meeting who counsel adolescent patients about contraception. We used thematic content analysis to analyze interview transcripts using Dedoose. Results: We identified six aspects of contraceptive counseling that clinicians commonly employed with adolescent patients. These were: (1) sociodemographic characteristics driving counseling, (2) reliance on tiered effectiveness counseling, (3) initiating counseling conversations using "ask then explain" or "explain then ask" approaches, (4) emphasis on teen pregnancy prevention, (5) the influence of method accessibility on counseling, and (6) parental involvement in decision-making and patient confidentiality. We describe how these themes align with or diverge from each component of the SDM framework. Conclusion: Clinicians in this study frequently engaged in non-patient-centered techniques during contraceptive counseling with adolescents. These findings can inform practice recommendations to support clinicians in providing high-quality contraceptive counseling using shared decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 346
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Semistructured interviews regarding patients' perceptions of Choosing Wisely and shared decision-making: an Australian study
    Allen, Jacqueline
    King, Richard
    Goergen, Stacy K.
    Melder, Angela
    Neeman, Naama
    Hadley, Annemarie
    Hutchinson, Alison M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [42] Veterans' Lung Cancer Risk Conceptualizations versus Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making Conversations with Clinicians: A Qualitative Study
    Boudreau, Jacqueline H.
    Bolton, Rendelle E.
    Nunez, Eduardo R.
    Caverly, Tanner J.
    Kearney, Lauren
    Sliwinski, Samantha
    Herbst, Abigail N.
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2025, 45 (01) : 86 - 96
  • [43] Shared Decision-Making Model for Adolescent Smoking Cessation: Pilot Cohort Study
    Chen, Kuan-Lun
    Hsu, Yun-Chen
    Li, Yi-Hsuan
    Guo, Fei-Ran
    Tsai, Jaw-Shiun
    Cheng, Shao-Yi
    Huang, Hsien-Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (20)
  • [44] Perspectives of clinicians on shared decision making in hospice care for advanced cancer patients in Nanjing: a descriptive qualitative study
    Tianyu Pang
    Kairan Yan
    Yujie Zhou
    Lulu Sun
    Ligui Wu
    Ling Yuan
    Zhi Zhou
    BMC Palliative Care, 24 (1)
  • [45] Patient and clinician perspectives on shared decision-making in infertility treatment: A qualitative study
    Geng, Ling
    Shi, Zhao
    Chai, Xiao-yun
    Nie, Hong-wei
    Cong, Hong-bin
    Li, Shun Ping
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 116
  • [46] Clinician and patient experiences with shared decision-making to promote daily arm use for individuals with chronic stroke: an exploratory qualitative study
    Gahlot, Amanda
    Richardson, Grace
    Librea, Patricia
    Kim, Grace J.
    FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2024, 5
  • [47] Exploring meningococcal serogroup B vaccination conversations under shared clinical decision-making in the US
    Herrera-Restrepo, Oscar
    Clements, Diana E.
    Hebert, Zachary N.
    McCracken, Chelsea
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2024, 40 (07) : 1253 - 1263
  • [48] Does the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing decision for breast cancer surgery?
    Lam, Wendy W. T.
    Kwok, Marie
    Chan, Miranda
    Hung, Wai Ka
    Ying, Marcus
    Or, Amy
    Kwong, Ava
    Suen, Dacita
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Fielding, Richard
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 94 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [49] Exploring women’s experiences of participation in shared decision-making during childbirth: a qualitative study at a reference hospital in Spain
    María López-Toribio
    Paulina Bravo
    Anna Llupià
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [50] Exploring the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making Involving Health Coaches for Diabetes and Hypertension Self-Management: Qualitative Study
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Tan, Chao Min
    Phang, Jie Kie
    Liu, Venice Xi
    Tan, Wee Boon
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Low, Lian Leng
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8