Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study

被引:2
|
作者
Thornton, Madeline [1 ]
Mann, Emily S. [2 ]
Bullington, Brooke W. [3 ]
Hartheimer, Joline [1 ]
Arora, Kavita Shah [4 ]
Allison, Bianca A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 231 McNider Bldg CB 7225 333 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
adolescent; contraceptive counseling; shared decision-making; HEALTH-CARE; YOUNG-ADULTS; BARRIERS; PROVIDER; BIAS; PERSPECTIVES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1111/psrh.12283
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adolescent contraceptive decision-making is influenced by a number of patient and clinician-driven factors. Although the AAP continues to endorse an efficacy-based model of contraceptive counseling, many professional organizations are shifting to a shared decision-making model as the optimal approach for providing unbiased and patient-driven contraceptive counseling. While SDM is intended to reduce the influence of clinician bias, it can exacerbate inequity if a clinician tailors a conversation based on their assumptions of a patient's goals or preferences. In this qualitative study, we explored self-reported contraceptive counseling practices among US-based clinicians who see adolescent patients to assess how these practices create barriers or facilitators to SDM and person-centered contraceptive care. Methods: We interviewed 16 clinicians at the 2022 AAP Annual Meeting who counsel adolescent patients about contraception. We used thematic content analysis to analyze interview transcripts using Dedoose. Results: We identified six aspects of contraceptive counseling that clinicians commonly employed with adolescent patients. These were: (1) sociodemographic characteristics driving counseling, (2) reliance on tiered effectiveness counseling, (3) initiating counseling conversations using "ask then explain" or "explain then ask" approaches, (4) emphasis on teen pregnancy prevention, (5) the influence of method accessibility on counseling, and (6) parental involvement in decision-making and patient confidentiality. We describe how these themes align with or diverge from each component of the SDM framework. Conclusion: Clinicians in this study frequently engaged in non-patient-centered techniques during contraceptive counseling with adolescents. These findings can inform practice recommendations to support clinicians in providing high-quality contraceptive counseling using shared decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 346
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investigation of factors influencing the implementation of two shared decision-making interventions in contraceptive care: a qualitative interview study among clinical and administrative staff
    Munro, Sarah
    Manski, Ruth
    Donnelly, Kyla Z.
    Agusti, Daniela
    Stevens, Gabrielle
    Banach, Michelle
    Boardman, Maureen B.
    Brady, Pearl
    Bradt, Chrissy Colon
    Foster, Tina
    Johnson, Deborah J.
    Norsigian, Judy
    Nothnagle, Melissa
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Stern, Lisa
    Trevena, Lyndal
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Thompson, Rachel
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [22] Real-world use and perceptions of shared decision-making for allergy and asthma care in a US population
    Eghrari-Sabet, Jacqueline
    Williams, Dennis
    Bukstein, Don A.
    Winders, Tonya
    Gardner, Donna D.
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2023, 16 (10):
  • [23] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Fen-Fang Chung
    Pao-Yu Wang
    Shu-Chuan Lin
    Yu-Hsia Lee
    Hon-Yen Wu
    Mei-Hsiang Lin
    BMC Nursing, 20
  • [24] Shared Decision-Making in Hemophilic Arthropathy Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study
    Liu, Yan-Qiu
    Guo, Yu-Lin
    Xu, Jia
    Geng, Wen-Jing
    Li, Zhen-Zhen
    Jia, Ming
    Liu, Yu-Dan
    Zhao, Hua
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 249 - 257
  • [25] Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study
    Ankolekar, Anshu
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Olling, Karina
    Dekker, Andre
    Wee, Leonard
    Roumen, Cheryl
    Hasannejadasl, Hajar
    Fijten, Rianne
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [26] Trust and shared decision-making among individuals with multiple myeloma: A qualitative study
    Whitney, Robin L.
    White, Anne Elizabeth Clark
    Rosenberg, Aaron S.
    Kravitz, Richard L.
    Kim, Katherine K.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22): : 8040 - 8057
  • [27] Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study
    Abma, Inger L.
    Roelofs, Lianne C. G.
    van der Kolk, Marion B.
    Mulder, Sasja F.
    Schers, Henk J.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (04)
  • [28] Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice
    Zeuner, Rachel
    Frosch, Dominick L.
    Kuzemchak, Marie D.
    Politi, Mary C.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 2465 - 2476
  • [29] Perspectives of physicians and doulas on shared decision-making and decision counseling in the treatment of pregnant women with opioid use disorders
    Jeminiwa, Ruth
    Dadabaev, Fadel
    Kim, Heeyoung
    Gannon, Megan
    Myers, Ronald
    Abatemarco, Diane J.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION TREATMENT, 2025, 168
  • [30] User participation and shared decision-making in adolescent mental healthcare: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
    Stig Bjønness
    Petter Viksveen
    Jan Olav Johannessen
    Marianne Storm
    Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 14