Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study

被引:2
|
作者
Thornton, Madeline [1 ]
Mann, Emily S. [2 ]
Bullington, Brooke W. [3 ]
Hartheimer, Joline [1 ]
Arora, Kavita Shah [4 ]
Allison, Bianca A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Univ North Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 231 McNider Bldg CB 7225 333 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
adolescent; contraceptive counseling; shared decision-making; HEALTH-CARE; YOUNG-ADULTS; BARRIERS; PROVIDER; BIAS; PERSPECTIVES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1111/psrh.12283
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adolescent contraceptive decision-making is influenced by a number of patient and clinician-driven factors. Although the AAP continues to endorse an efficacy-based model of contraceptive counseling, many professional organizations are shifting to a shared decision-making model as the optimal approach for providing unbiased and patient-driven contraceptive counseling. While SDM is intended to reduce the influence of clinician bias, it can exacerbate inequity if a clinician tailors a conversation based on their assumptions of a patient's goals or preferences. In this qualitative study, we explored self-reported contraceptive counseling practices among US-based clinicians who see adolescent patients to assess how these practices create barriers or facilitators to SDM and person-centered contraceptive care. Methods: We interviewed 16 clinicians at the 2022 AAP Annual Meeting who counsel adolescent patients about contraception. We used thematic content analysis to analyze interview transcripts using Dedoose. Results: We identified six aspects of contraceptive counseling that clinicians commonly employed with adolescent patients. These were: (1) sociodemographic characteristics driving counseling, (2) reliance on tiered effectiveness counseling, (3) initiating counseling conversations using "ask then explain" or "explain then ask" approaches, (4) emphasis on teen pregnancy prevention, (5) the influence of method accessibility on counseling, and (6) parental involvement in decision-making and patient confidentiality. We describe how these themes align with or diverge from each component of the SDM framework. Conclusion: Clinicians in this study frequently engaged in non-patient-centered techniques during contraceptive counseling with adolescents. These findings can inform practice recommendations to support clinicians in providing high-quality contraceptive counseling using shared decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 346
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling
    Bullington, Brooke W.
    Sata, Asha
    Arora, Kavita Shah
    OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 13 : 121 - 129
  • [2] Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators
    Chong, Wei Wen
    Aslani, Parisa
    Chen, Timothy F.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2013, 27 (05) : 373 - 379
  • [3] Shared decision-making for women facing an unplanned pregnancy: A qualitative study
    Ueno, Yoko
    Kako, Mayumi
    Ohira, Mitsuko
    Okamura, Hitoshi
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 22 (04) : 1186 - 1196
  • [4] An in-depth analysis of the use of shared decision making in contraceptive counseling
    Chen, Margaret
    Lindley, Alexa
    Kimport, Katrina
    Dehlendorf, Christine
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 99 (03) : 187 - 191
  • [5] What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening
    Melzer, Anne C.
    Golden, Sara E.
    Ono, Sarah S.
    Datta, Santanu
    Crothers, Kristina
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (02) : 546 - 553
  • [6] GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study
    Nyamapfene, Taona
    Butterworth, Joanne
    Merchant, Haider
    Eaton, Mike
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73 (729) : E310 - E317
  • [7] Will older persons and their clinicians use a shared decision-making instrument?
    Naik, AD
    Schulman-Green, D
    McCorkle, R
    Bradley, EH
    Bogardus, ST
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (07) : 640 - 643
  • [8] Will older persons and their clinicians use a shared decision-making instrument?
    Aanand D. Naik
    Dena Schulman-Green
    Ruth McCorkle
    Elizabeth H. Bradley
    Sidney T. Bogardus
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2005, 20 : 640 - 643
  • [9] Latina contraceptive decision-making and use: The importance of provider communication and shared decision-making for patient-centered care
    Carvajal, Diana N.
    Klyushnenkova, Elena
    Barnet, Beth
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (09) : 2159 - 2164
  • [10] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Chung, Fen-Fang
    Wang, Pao-Yu
    Lin, Shu-Chuan
    Lee, Yu-Hsia
    Wu, Hon-Yen
    Lin, Mei-Hsiang
    BMC NURSING, 2021, 20 (01)