Top-Down Task Goals Induce the Retrieval State

被引:1
作者
Smith, Devyn E. [1 ]
Long, Nicole M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
brain state; EEG; encoding; retrieval; MVPA; MEMORY RETRIEVAL; ATTENTION; BRAIN; NOVELTY; MODE; HIPPOCAMPUS; DRIVEN;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0452-24.2024
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Engaging the retrieval state (Tulving, 1983) impacts processing and behavior (Long and Kuhl, 2019, 2021; Smith et al., 2022), but the extent to which top-down factors-explicit - explicit instructions and goals-versus - versus bottom-up factors-stimulus - stimulus properties such as repetition and similarity-jointly - jointly or independently induce the retrieval state is unclear. Identifying the impact of bottom-up and top-down factors on retrieval state engagement is critical for understanding how control of task-relevant versus task-irrelevant brain states influence fl uence cognition. We conducted between-subjects recognition memory tasks on male and female human participants in which we varied test phase goals. We recorded scalp electroencephalography and used an independently validated mnemonic state classifier fi er (Long, 2023) to measure retrieval state engagement as a function of top-down task goals (recognize old vs detect new items) and bottom-up stimulus repetition (hits vs correct rejections (CRs)). We fi nd that whereas the retrieval state is engaged for hits regardless of top-down goals, the retrieval state is only engaged during CRs when the top-down goal is to recognize old items. Furthermore, retrieval state engagement is greater for low compared to high confidence fi dence hits when the task goal is to recognize old items. Together, these results suggest that top-down demands to recognize old items induce the retrieval state independent from bottom-up factors, potentially reflecting fl ecting the recruitment of internal attention to enable access of a stored representation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]   The intersection of the retrieval state and internal attention [J].
Long, Nicole M. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
[32]   Cortical Representations of Visual Stimuli Shift Locations with Changes in Memory States [J].
Long, Nicole M. ;
Kuhl, Brice A. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (05) :1119-+
[33]   Decoding the tradeoff between encoding and retrieval to predict memory for overlapping events [J].
Long, Nicole M. ;
Kuhl, Brice A. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 201
[34]   Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks [J].
Long, Nicole M. ;
Kuhl, Brice A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 38 (10) :2495-2504
[35]   Successful memory formation is driven by contextual encoding in the core memory network [J].
Long, Nicole M. ;
Kahana, Michael J. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 119 :332-337
[36]  
Long NM, 2018, Steven's handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience, V4
[37]  
Nobre AC, 2018, Steven's handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience, V4
[38]   FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection [J].
Nolan, H. ;
Whelan, R. ;
Reilly, R. B. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2010, 192 (01) :152-162
[39]   Lingering Cognitive States Shape Fundamental Mnemonic Abilities [J].
Patil, Anuya ;
Duncan, Katherine .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (01) :45-55
[40]   Memory search and the neural representation of context [J].
Polyn, Sean M. ;
Kahana, Michael J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (01) :24-30