Anti-Corruption Initiatives and the Digital Challenge: The Role of Civil Society Organizations and Whistleblowing Infrastructures in the Italian Context

被引:0
作者
Fubini, Alice [1 ]
Lo Piccolo, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Polit & Social Sci, Bologna, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
anti-corruption; whistleblowing; collective action; civil society organizations; digital media; infrastructures; SOCIAL-MOVEMENT; ACTIVISM; MEDIA; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1177/00027642241268590
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Civil society organizations increasingly rely on digital technologies to intervene in the whistleblowing process and advance their anti-corruption goals. However, scholars have yet to investigate how civil society organizations' use of digital technologies impacts their role as whistleblowing actors and what consequences this might entail. Moving from this gap, the article explores how civil society organizations exploit digital technologies to intervene in the whistleblowing process and how their use of digital technologies affects patterns of interactions with institutional actors in the whistleblowing process. The article combines situational and thematic analysis to investigate three whistleblowing initiatives deployed by Italian civil society organizations: Linea Libera, the Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre for Whistleblowers, and Whistleblowing PA. The results show that grassroots whistleblowing initiatives are more than just services or tools but represent whistleblowing infrastructures, running on more or less sophisticated technologies, which grant their developers a role as low- or high-tech intermediaries in the whistleblowing process, in turn affecting the relational dynamics between grassroots and institutional actors and civil society organizations' influence over the whistleblowing process.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   Securing Whistleblowing in the Digital Age: SecureDrop and the Changing Journalistic Practices for Source Protection [J].
Di Salvo, Philip .
DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2021, 9 (04) :443-460
[22]  
Diani M., 1997, MOBILIZATION INT Q, V2, P129, DOI [DOI 10.17813/MAIQ.2.2.W6087622383H4341, 10.17813/maiq.2.2.w6087622383h4341]
[23]   Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowering processes [J].
Dworkin, TM ;
Baucus, MS .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1998, 17 (12) :1281-1298
[24]  
Earl Jennifer., 2016, The Consequences of Social Movements, P363
[25]  
Fubini A., 2023, ECPR GEN C PRAG CZEC
[26]  
Grimes M., 2008, QoG Working Paper Series, P22
[27]  
Halloway I., 2003, Qualitative Research, V3, P345, DOI [10.1177/1468794103033004, DOI 10.1177/1468794103033004]
[28]  
Hess D.J., 2015, Routledge international handbook of ignorance studies, P141, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315867762-18, DOI 10.4324/9781315867762]
[29]   Technology- and product-oriented movements: Approximating social movement studies and science and technology studies [J].
Hess, DJ .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2005, 30 (04) :515-535
[30]  
James Rina., 2014, Young Scholars in Writing, V11, P17