Comprehensive Analysis of Navigational Accidents Using the MAART Method: A Novel Examination of Human Error Probability in Maritime Collisions and Groundings

被引:0
作者
Bowo, L. P. [1 ]
Gusti, A. P. [1 ]
Waskito, D. H. [1 ]
Puriningsih, F. S. [1 ]
Muhtadi, A. [1 ]
Furusho, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Jakarta, Indonesia
[2] Kobe Univ, Kobe, Japan
关键词
HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; MODIFIED HEART; INDONESIA; MARINE;
D O I
10.12716/1001.18.03.10
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Navigational accidents are one of the most common types of maritime accidents, and they can result from various factors, including human error, adverse weather conditions, technical issues with the ship, or a combination of these factors. In this study, navigational accidents, including collision and grounding, that occurred in Germany were analysed using the MAART method. The novelty of this research lies in its detailed examination of the Human Error Probability (HEP) result, which has yet to be explored in previous studies. There are 47 collision cases and 15 grounding cases in the 13-year occurrence period. In total, 290 causal factors were found in the analysis. Furthermore, it is found that management, media, and machines are the main causal factors in navigational accidents in Germany. In collision accidents, management factors had the highest number of contributing factors, followed by media and machine e factors. Contrary to grounding accidents, based on the results of the EPC, the machine factor had the highest number of contributing factors to accidents, followed by media and management. Finally, the human error probability values for collision accidents range from 0.06 to 1, averaging 0.54. In contrast, the HEP values for grounding accidents range from 0.0048 to 1, averaging 0.26.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] Identifying factors influencing total-loss marine accidents in the world: Analysis and evaluation based on ship types and sea regions
    Chen, Jihong
    Bian, Wentao
    Wan, Zheng
    Yang, Zaili
    Zheng, Huiying
    Wang, Paopao
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 191
  • [12] De Maya BN, 2018, Papers, P44
  • [13] A framework for human error analysis of offshore evacuations
    Deacon, T.
    Amyotte, P. R.
    Khan, F. I.
    MacKinnon, S.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 51 (01) : 319 - 327
  • [14] A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)
    Di Pasquale, Valentina
    Miranda, Salvatore
    Iannone, Raffaele
    Riemrna, Stefano
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 139 : 17 - 32
  • [15] Review and analysis of methods for assessing maritime waterway risk based on non-accident critical events detected from AIS data
    Du, Lei
    Goerlandt, Floris
    Kujala, Pentti
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 200
  • [16] The impacts of risk level based on PSC inspection deficiencies on ship accident consequences
    Fan, Lixian
    Wang, Mengying
    Yin, Jingbo
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33
  • [17] Gibson WH, 2008, 9 INT C PROBABILISTI, V2, P1312
  • [18] On error management: lessons from aviation
    Helmreich, RL
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7237) : 781 - 785
  • [19] Development of a human reliability assessment technique for the maintenance procedures of marine and offshore operations
    Islam, Rabiul
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    Garaniya, Vikram
    Khan, Faisal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 50 : 416 - 428
  • [20] ITF, 2010, STCW: A Guide for Seafarers: Taking into account the 2010 Manila amendments