Evaluation of the Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Pediatric Exams: A College of Medicine Departmental Review

被引:0
|
作者
Mustafa, Alam Eldin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Khalid Univ, Dept Child Hlth, Abha, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Item analysis; multiple choice questions; Difficulty index; Discrimination index; Distractors; Non- functional distractor; Reliability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the detailed indices of the analysis of the items of the written multiple-choice questions (MCQs) exams in the Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine over the last four academic years (1439-1443 AH) and to construct the outlines of a plan for improving the upcoming written MCQs exams. Methods: This was retrospective cross-sectional study on the item analysis of the exams in the MBBS course of pediatrics-2 for both boys and girls group in the Child Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia for the midterm MCQs exams in the years of 1439,1440,1441,1442 and the first semester of girl group in 1443. The total number of items studied in these 16 exams were 643 items. The data was obtained constitute the difficulty, discrimination, point biserial reliability and distractor analysis of each of the exams items. The data was tabulated and the statistical significance determined for some variables in the analysis. Results: Total number of students enrolled in the study were 1002.The total number of items studied were 643 items. Regarding students' scores were as follows: A scored by 73 students (7.3%), B by 219 (21.8%), C by 331 (33%), D by 214 (21.4%) and F by 165 (16.5%). Difficulty index: considering a difficulty index of 80% as easy item of 30% or less as difficult item and that between 30% and 80% of moderate difficult; we obtain 3 categories of items: difficult items were 43 (6.6%) of the total items, moderate difficulty items were 343 (53.4%) and easy items 257 (40%). There was significant statistical correlation (p <= 0.05) when these difficulty levels compared over the exam years. Conclusions: Departmental exam committee needs to work comprehensively to improve the difficulty of the exams towards moderate intermediate class also the quality of the questions need extensive work on refining the distractors and revision of the correctness and the suitability of a considerable number of items.
引用
收藏
页码:2363 / 2369
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments
    Tarrant, Marie
    Knierim, Aimee
    Hayes, Sasha K.
    Ware, James
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2006, 26 (08) : 662 - 671
  • [32] Do Subject Matter Experts' Judgments of Multiple-Choice Format Suitability Predict Item Quality?
    Berenbon, Rebecca F. F.
    McHugh, Bridget C. C.
    EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2023, 42 (03) : 13 - 21
  • [33] Item analysis of multiple choice questions from assessment of health sciences students, Tigray, Ethiopia
    Gebremichael, Mengistu Welday
    Baraki, Beyene
    Mehari, Mihret-Ab
    Assalfew, Betel
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [34] Are multiple-choice questions a good tool for the assessment of clinical competence in Internal Medicine?
    Tangianu, Flavio
    Mazzone, Antonino
    Berti, Franco
    Pinna, Giuliano
    Bortolotti, Irene
    Colombo, Fabrizio
    Nozzoli, Carlo
    La Regina, Micaela
    Greco, Antonio
    Filannino, Cristina
    Silingardi, Mauro
    Nardi, Roberto
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 12 (02) : 88 - 96
  • [35] Computer-based evaluation to assess students' learning for the multiple-choice question-based exams: CBE-MCQs software tool
    Solak, Serdar
    Ucar, Mustafa H. B.
    Albadwieh, Mohammad
    COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2020, 28 (06) : 1406 - 1420
  • [36] Item-analysis of Multiple Choice Questions: A Pilot Attempt to Analyze Formative Assessment in Pharmacology
    Shenoy, Preethi J.
    Sayeli, Vinaykumar
    Rao, Rashmi R.
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (02): : 1683 - 1687
  • [37] MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CODING, TABULATION AND ANALYSIS
    Serrano Angulo, Jose
    RIE-REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA, 2013, 31 (02): : 361 - 374
  • [38] Automatic distractor generation in multiple-choice questions: a systematic literature review
    Awalurahman, Halim Wildan
    Budi, Indra
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 10
  • [39] The Utility of Multiple-Choice Assessment in Current Medical Education: A Critical Review
    Parekh, Priya
    Bahadoor, Vikesh
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [40] Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws
    Kowash, Mawlood
    Alhobeira, Hazza
    Hussein, Iyad
    Al Halabi, Manal
    Khan, Saif
    MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2020, 25 (01):