I Love You but I Hate Your Politics: The Role of Political Dissimilarity in Romantic Relationships

被引:0
作者
Gordon, Amie M. [1 ]
Luciani, Maria [2 ]
From, Annika [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, 530 Church St,1004 East Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
political polarization; political similarity; romantic relationships; relationship quality; daily diary; RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION; AFFECTIVE POLARIZATION; INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY; MARITAL QUALITY; SIMILARITY; ATTRACTION; PARTY; CONSEQUENCES; VALUES;
D O I
10.1037/pspi0000467
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Amid heightened political polarization in the United States, have politics worked their way into the bedroom? An increase in political similarity between romantic partners has consequences not just for romantic relationships but for society as a whole; political homophily increases our political echo chambers and affects future generations. We drew upon 11 data sets with over 4,000 individuals (including more than 500 couples) to test four preregistered research questions about the prevalence, correlates, consequences, and potential buffers of political dissimilarity in modern-day relationships. Across measures of similarity (overall perceptions, partisanship matching, shared political ideology), couples in our sample showed high levels of political similarity (e.g., 23% were cross-partisan, with fewer than 8% composed of one Democrat and one Republican). Examining 18 potential correlates of political dissimilarity, we found little evidence that certain factors predispose people to end up in a politically dissimilar relationship. When considering the potential consequences of political dissimilarity, we found a small association between political dissimilarity and relationship quality in general and in daily life. The effect was evident when examining perceived political dissimilarity (over and above perceptions of overall similarity) and, to a lesser extent, dissimilarity in terms of partisanship and political ideology. Prosocial processes such as appreciation and perspective-taking may moderate these effects. Taken together, these findings speak to the need to further consider the ways in which the sociopolitical context is shaping the formation and maintenance of close relationships.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 86 条
[31]   The Home as a Political Fortress: Family Agreement in an Era of Polarization [J].
Iyengar, Shanto ;
Konitzer, Tobias ;
Tedin, Kent .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2018, 80 (04) :1326-1338
[32]   Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization [J].
Iyengar, Shanto ;
Westwood, Sean J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 59 (03) :690-707
[33]   AFFECT, NOT IDEOLOGY A SOCIAL IDENTITY PERSPECTIVE ON POLARIZATION [J].
Iyengar, Shanto ;
Sood, Gaurav ;
Lelkes, Yphtach .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2012, 76 (03) :405-431
[34]   Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies [J].
Joel, Samantha ;
Eastwick, Paul W. ;
Allison, Colleen J. ;
Arriaga, Ximena B. ;
Baker, Zachary G. ;
Bar-Kalifa, Eran ;
Bergeron, Sophie ;
Birnbaum, Gurit E. ;
Brock, Rebecca L. ;
Brumbaugh, Claudia C. ;
Carmichael, Cheryl L. ;
Chen, Serena ;
Clarke, Jennifer ;
Cobb, Rebecca J. ;
Coolsen, Michael K. ;
Davis, Jody ;
de Jong, David C. ;
Debrot, Anik ;
DeHaas, Eva C. ;
Derrick, Jaye L. ;
Eller, Jami ;
Estrada, Marie-Joelle ;
Faure, Ruddy ;
Finkel, Eli J. ;
Fraley, R. Chris ;
Gable, Shelly L. ;
Gadassi-Polack, Reuma ;
Girme, Yuthika U. ;
Gordon, Amie M. ;
Gosnell, Courtney L. ;
Hammond, Matthew D. ;
Hannon, Peggy A. ;
Harasymchuk, Cheryl ;
Hofmann, Wilhelm ;
Horn, Andrea B. ;
Impett, Emily A. ;
Jamieson, Jeremy P. ;
Keltner, Dacher ;
Kim, James J. ;
Kirchner, Jeffrey L. ;
Kluwer, Esther ;
Kumashiro, Madoka ;
Larson, Grace ;
Lazarus, Gal ;
Logan, Jill M. ;
Luchies, Laura B. ;
MacDonald, Geoff ;
Machia, Laura V. ;
Maniaci, Michael R. ;
Maxwell, Jessica A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (32) :19061-19071
[35]  
John O. P., 2008, PARADIGM SHIFT INTEG
[36]   The political values and choices of husbands and wives [J].
Kan, MY ;
Heath, A .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2006, 68 (01) :70-86
[37]   Are Couples More Satisfied When They Match in Sexual Desire?: New Insights From Response Surface Analyses [J].
Kim, James J. ;
Muise, Amy ;
Barranti, Max ;
Mark, Kristen P. ;
Rosen, Natalie O. ;
Harasymchuk, Cheryl ;
Impett, Emily .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2021, 12 (04) :487-496
[38]   Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responses [J].
Kim, Joon Kyoung ;
Overton, Holly ;
Bhalla, Nandini ;
Li, Jo-Yun .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2020, 46 (02)
[39]   AFFECTIVE POLARIZATION OR PARTISAN DISDAIN? UNTANGLING A DISLIKE FOR THE OPPOSING PARTY FROM A DISLIKE OF PARTISANSHIP [J].
Klar, Samara ;
Krupnikov, Yanna ;
Ryan, John Barry .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2018, 82 (02) :379-390
[40]   The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives [J].
Klofstad, Casey A. ;
McDermott, Rose ;
Hatemi, Peter K. .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 35 (03) :519-538