Comparison of in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and six commercial ELISAs for Detection of antibodies to Bordetella pertussis

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are currently the method of choice for the serodiagnosis of pertussis and play a key role in the diagnosis of pertussis in adolescents and adults, as well as in epidemiological studies. In the present study, the in-house developed indirect ELISA was comparatively evaluated with six commercial kits from various manufacturers. Antipertussis antibodies were measured in 40 serum samples from patients with clinical symptoms of respiratory tract infection, in two WHO standards, and in seven human ECDC control sera. IgA and IgG antibodies were detected at a diagnostically significant level by different ELISA kits of 5.0% to 27.0% and 12.0% to 70.0% of patients' sera, appropriately. The analysis of results carried out with six commercial kits showed only 17.5% consistent results in class IgG (either clearly positive or negative). The average percentage of errors in the level of antibodies determined in the control samples, reference serum samples, differed quite significantly and ranged from 9.5% to 35.4% depending on the kit. This poor correlation of the results obtained on various serological tests intended for the serodiagnosis of pertussis may cause very serious diagnostic problems, especially when examining a serum sample obtained once during the course of the disease.