Stochastic Frontier Analysis of the Romanian Food Industry

被引:0
作者
Kulcsar, Edina [1 ]
Tarnoczi, Tibor [1 ]
机构
[1] Partium Christian Univ, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Dept Econ, Oradea, Romania
关键词
Financial performance; benchmarking; efficiency; productivity function; Stochastic Frontier Analysis; TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY; EFFICIENCY; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.14254/1800-5845/2024.20-4.1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aims to investigate the Romanian food industry companies' perfor-mance. The performance analysis was performed using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), which was based on the financial statements of 1 464 Roma-nian food industry firms between 2018 and 2020. The companies operate in different sub-sectors of the food industry. In contrast to DEA, stochastic fron-tier analysis (SFA) requires a production function to evaluate efficiency. Gross value added was used as the result variable in the production function. The explanatory variables of the efficiency model were material costs, employee expenses, depreciation and amortisation, and other operating expenses. The results of the SFA calculation show that all regression coefficients are signif-icant at less than 0.01% level. Based on the SFA analysis results, it can be concluded that 87% of the examined food companies have achieved at least 50% efficiency in all three years. The average efficiency scores of all sub-sectors are above 0.66, which can be considered good enough. Then some classification criteria (as 'z' variables) were included in the SFA model consid-ering heterogeneity, such as region, sub-sector, and size based on the num-ber of employees. Considering thesefactors, the average efficiency of food industry companies improve significantly by 26.51% in all three years. SFA analysis by sectors shows that companies operating in fruit and vegetable processing have the lowest average efficiency (0.60). The highest efficiency can be observed in other food products (0.71) and milk and dairy processing (0.69) companies. Enterprises with more than 250 employees (0.73) and 1-4 employees (0.71) are more efficient than medium-sized enterprises. The efficiency scores also show moderate differences between regions with the lowest and highest efficiency (9.37%).
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 17
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Atilgan E, 2016, Pressacademia, V5, P17, DOI [10.17261/pressacademia.2016116550, 10.17261/pressacademia.2016116550, DOI 10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2016116550]
[2]   An Analysis of Technical Efficiency in the Presence of Developments Toward Commercialization: Evidence from Tanzania's Milk Producers [J].
Bahta, Sirak ;
Comore, Amos ;
Baker, Darek ;
Okike, Iheanacho ;
Gebremedhin, Berhanu ;
Wanyoike, Francis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (03) :502-525
[3]  
Battese G.E., 1992, J PROD ANAL, V3, P153, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158774, DOI 10.1007/BF00158774, 10.1007/BF00158774]
[4]  
Behr A., 2015, Production and Efficiency Analysis with R
[5]  
Cechura L, 2022, AGR ECON-CZECH, V68, P1, DOI [10.17221/384/2021-AGRICECON, 10.17221/384/2021]
[6]  
Coelli T.J., 2005, An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis
[7]   Cost efficiency of the Chinese banking sector: A comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis [J].
Dong, Yizhe ;
Hamilton, Robert ;
Tippett, Mark .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 36 :298-308
[8]  
Ferrier G., 1999, Working Paper, P99
[9]   A Cobb Douglas Stochastic Frontier Model on Measuring Domestic Bank Efficiency in Malaysia [J].
Hasan, Md. Zobaer ;
Kamil, Anton Abdulbasah ;
Mustafa, Adli ;
Baten, Md. Azizul .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08)
[10]   Comparison of economic efficiency estimation methods: Parametric and non-parametric techniques [J].
Huang, TH ;
Wang, MH .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2002, 70 (05) :682-709