On stress ratio equations in three-dimensional stress space for modelling soil behaviour

被引:3
作者
Handspiker, Wyatt [1 ]
Liu, Zhenyu [1 ,2 ]
Ghafghazi, Mason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil & Mineral Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastructure Engn, Melbourne, Australia
来源
GEOTECHNICAL RESEARCH | 2024年 / 11卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
soil plasticity; constitutive modelling; yield surface; Lode angle; NorSand; SAND;
D O I
10.1680/jgere.23.00073
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Constitutive models and failure criteria of soils, rocks, and other materials often need to be extended beyond the triaxial state where they are usually defined, for plane strain, axisymmetric, or three-dimensional analyses. This extension is commonly done by making the stress ratio a function of the Lode angle. This process turns two-dimensional yield, plastic potential, bounding, dilatancy and similar surfaces into three-dimensional shapes such as cones and bullets. The equations used have a range of shapes on the octahedral or pi-plane between Mohr-Coulomb's irregular hexagon and Drucker-Prager's circle. Nine stress ratio generalization equations popular in soil mechanics are evaluated based on numerical stability, agreement with available data, and ease of implementation. The computed limits on their convexity, and the flexibility they offer in the calibration process are discussed. At the end, a new equation that satisfies all these criteria while remaining simple and easy to calibrate is proposed, implemented in a finite element model, and demonstrated to improve numerical stability and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 255
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE REACTOR VESSELS [J].
ARGYRIS, JH ;
FAUST, G ;
SZIMMAT, J ;
WARNKE, EP ;
WILLAM, KJ .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1974, 28 (01) :42-75
[2]  
Brinkgreve R.B.J., 1994, Geomaterial models and numerical analysis of softening
[3]   3D FE Analyses of Buried Pipeline with Elbows Subjected to Lateral Loading [J].
Cheong, T. P. ;
Soga, K. ;
Robert, D. J. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 137 (10) :939-948
[4]  
Cheong T.P., 2006, Numerical modelling of soil-pipeline interaction
[5]  
Cornforth D.H., 1964, Geotechnique, V14, P143
[6]  
Cornforth DH, 1961, THESIS U LONDON LOND
[7]  
Coulomb C-A, 1776, Paris Mem Math Phys Acad Roy Sci par Divers Savants, P7
[8]   Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects [J].
Dafalias, YF ;
Manzari, MT .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2004, 130 (06) :622-634
[9]  
Drucker D.C., 1959, Journal of Applied Mechanics, P101, DOI DOI 10.1115/1.4011929
[10]   SOIL MECHANICS AND PLASTIC ANALYSIS OR LIMIT DESIGN [J].
DRUCKER, DC ;
PRAGER, W .
QUARTERLY OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1952, 10 (02) :157-165