Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population

被引:3
作者
Jayakumar, T. [1 ,2 ]
Rajasudhakar, R. [1 ]
Benoy, Jesnu Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mysore, All India Inst Speech & Hearing, Dept Speech Language Sci, Speech Sci, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
[2] Univ Mysore, All India Inst Speech & Hearing, Dept Speech Language Sci, Mysuru 570006, Karnataka, India
关键词
AVQI-Acoustic; Acoustic Evaluation of Voice; Auditory-Perceptual Judgement; Voice Quality; Multi-parametric voice evaluation; DYSPHONIA SEVERITY INDEX; PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.02.019
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background. Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) has emerged in the recent past as a robust multiparametric voice quality evaluation tool. Two versions of AVQI derived using the program PRAAT have found extensive clinical and research applications. These versions have been validated in several languages around the world. However, no research reports are available on validation of AVQI in the South Indian population. Further, studies comparing the performance of the two versions of AVQI are limited in the literature. Objectives. This study was designed to validate and compare the two versions of AVQI (AVQIv02.02 and AVQIv03.01) in South Indian languages (Malayalam and Kannada). Methods. A retrospective analysis of previously recorded voice samples was carried out on a total of 160 (91 normophonic and 69 dysphonic) voice samples. These samples were perceptually rated on a GRBAS scale by five experienced speech-language pathologists. Standardized Syllable Number (SSN) necessary to derive AVQIv03.01 was computed. Following this, these samples were analyzed to obtain the AVQIv02.02 and AVQIv03.01. The concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of these measures were then examined and compared. Results. A moderate agreement was obtained across the judges on perceptual evaluation of voice quality. SSN in Malayalam and Kannada languages were identified to be 29 and 25 syllables respectively. Language differences were not observed on both versions of AVQI. The concurrent validity of AVQIv03.01 (r r = 0.788) was superior to that of AVQIv02.02 (r r = 0.655). Further, the threshold of differentiating normophonic and dysphonic samples were determined to be >3.45 for AVQIv02.02 and >2.45 for AVQIv03.01. Conclusions. AVQIv03.01 is superior to AVQIv02.02 in terms of its diagnostic accuracy and concurrent validity. Current findings also extend the application of AVQI as a robust tool for the evaluation of voice characteristics to the South Indian population.
引用
收藏
页码:1248e1 / 1248e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice
    Akobeng, Anthony K.
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (04) : 487 - 491
  • [2] Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores
    Awan, Shaheen N.
    Roy, Nelson
    Zhang, Dong
    Cohen, Seth M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2016, 30 (02) : 130 - 144
  • [3] Spectral-Cepstral Estimation of Dysphonia Severity: External Validation
    Awan, Shaheen N.
    Solomon, Nancy Pearl
    Helou, Leah B.
    Stojadinovic, Alexander
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [4] The Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Toward expanded measurement of dysphonia severity in German subjects
    Barsties, B.
    Maryn, Y.
    [J]. HNO, 2012, 60 (08) : 715 - 720
  • [5] External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity
    Barsties, Ben
    Maryn, Youri
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 125 (07) : 571 - 583
  • [6] The improvement of internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index
    Barsties, Ben
    Maryn, Youri
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 36 (05) : 647 - 656
  • [7] Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art
    Barsties, Ben
    De Bodt, Marc
    [J]. AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2015, 42 (03) : 183 - 188
  • [8] Boersma P., 2001, GLOT INT, V5, P341, DOI DOI 10.1097/AUD.0B013E31821473F7
  • [9] Multi Parametric Voice Assessment: Sri Ramachandra University Protocol
    Boominathan P.
    Samuel J.
    Arunachalam R.
    Nagarajan R.
    Mahalingam S.
    [J]. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2014, 66 (Suppl 1) : 246 - 251
  • [10] A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques - Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS)
    Dejonckere, PH
    Bradley, P
    Clemente, P
    Cornut, G
    Crevier-Buchman, L
    Friedrich, G
    Van de Heyning, P
    Remacle, M
    Woisard, V
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 258 (02) : 77 - 82