Economic burden of suicide deaths in India (2019): a retrospective, cross-sectional study

被引:1
作者
Nigam, Anukrati [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vuddemarry, Madhurima [1 ,4 ]
Zadey, Siddhesh [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Socially Applicable Res, D2 Sai Heritage,New DP Rd, Pune 411007, Maharashtra, India
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] PEGASUS Inst, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Rajarshee Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Govt Med Coll, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
[5] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
[6] Duke Univ, GEMINI Res Ctr, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[7] Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India
来源
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - SOUTHEAST ASIA | 2024年 / 29卷
关键词
Suicide; India; Health economics; Human capital approach; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100477
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background India has the highest number of suicide deaths in the world. Suicide prevention requires policy attention and resource allocation. Evidence of economic losses due to disease burden can influence fl uence such allocations. We assessed the economic burden and its distribution across states and demographic groups in India. Methods We used the human capital approach in this retrospective cross-sectional analysis to assess the economic burden of suicide in India for the year 2019 for 28 Indian states and 3 union territories (UTs). We calculated the monetary value for the years of life lost disaggregated by states, age groups, and sexes. For sensitivity, we present a library of estimates using different discount rates, life expectancy thresholds, and estimates specific fi c to the populations that can participate in the workforce. Findings The national economic burden of suicide was US$ 16,749,079,455 (95% Uncertainty Interval: 11,913,034,910-22,404,233,468). - 22,404,233,468). The top three states, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Maharashtra, contributed to 44.82% of the total burden in India. The age group 20-34 - 34 years had the largest suicide burden and contributed to 53.05% of the overall national economic burden (US$ 8,885,436,385 [6,493,912,818-11,694,138,884]). - 11,694,138,884]). Twenty states and UTs had a greater economic burden for females than males. Interpretation The current analysis ascertains a high economic burden of suicide among the Indian youth and females, necessitating concerted multisectoral efforts and immediate investments. Funding None.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, GLOBAL BURDEN DIS ST, DOI 10.6069/KHWH-2703
  • [2] Suicide in India: a complex public health tragedy in need of a plan
    Armstrong, Gregory
    Vijayakumar, Lakshmi
    [J]. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 3 (10) : E459 - E460
  • [3] Estimating patterns in the under-reporting of suicide deaths in India: comparison of administrative data and Global Burden of Disease Study estimates, 2005-2015
    Arya, Vikas
    Page, Andrew
    Armstrong, Gregory
    Kumar, G. Anil
    Dandona, Rakhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 75 (06) : 550 - 555
  • [4] The Geographic Heterogeneity of Suicide Rates in India by Religion, Caste, Tribe, and Other Backward Classes
    Arya, Vikas
    Page, Andrew
    Dandonaz, Rakhi
    Vijayakumar, Lakshmi
    Mayer, Peter
    Armstrong, Gregory
    [J]. CRISIS-THE JOURNAL OF CRISIS INTERVENTION AND SUICIDE PREVENTION, 2019, 40 (05) : 370 - 374
  • [5] Discounting in Economic Evaluations
    Attema, Arthur E.
    Brouwer, Werner B. F.
    Claxton, Karl
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2018, 36 (07) : 745 - 758
  • [6] Bloom DE., 2014, EC NONCOMMUNICABLE D
  • [7] Dalal K., 2015, Health, V7, P487
  • [8] Directorate General of Health Services, 1982, National mental health program
  • [9] Economic and epidemiological impact of youth suicide in countries with the highest human development index
    Doran, Christopher M.
    Kinchin, Irina
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [10] National Mental Health Policy, India (2014): Where Have We Reached?
    Gupta, Snehil
    Sagar, Rajesh
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 44 (05) : 510 - 515