A game theory analysis of regional innovation ecosystems

被引:4
作者
Shakiba, Hojjat [1 ]
Belitski, Maksim [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Razi Univ, Kermanshah, Iran
[2] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6UD, England
[3] ICD Business Sch, IGS Grp, F-75010 Paris, France
关键词
Innovation ecosystem; Region; Nishapur city; Knowledge cooperation; Game theory; INSTITUTIONAL COLLECTIVE ACTION; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION; VALUE CREATION; ENTREPRENEURIAL INNOVATION; GRAPH MODEL; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY; EVOLUTION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-024-10131-4
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Despite the popularity of innovation ecosystems in the regional studies literature, the organization of knowledge cooperation and transfer within these ecosystems remains largely unexplored, particularly in countries and regions where the government plays a significant role. Regional studies and innovation literature have not addressed how and under which conditions actors start cooperation in the ecosystem, often assuming that knowledge cooperation between agents is a truism. This paper employs a Game Theory approach to examine the knowledge cooperation networks within the Nishapur Innovation Ecosystem. The model results demonstrated that seven key actors are pivotal in explaining knowledge cooperation within the ecosystem. Eighteen feasible states were identified based on the actors and their strategies. Results indicated that with the current actors and their current preferences, the current state is most likely to continue, therefore, the probability of operationalizing one model of behavior in the Nishapur innovation ecosystem is low. The results obtained from the reverse game analysis revealed that appropriate regional policies are required to ensure that the ecosystem is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 820
页数:24
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Audretsch, David B. ;
Lehmann, Erik E. .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2013, 41 (04) :757-774
[2]  
Adner R, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P98
[3]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[4]  
Altenburg T, 2009, HANDBOOK OF INNOVATION SYSTEMS AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: BUILDING DOMESTIC CAPABILITIES IN A GLOBAL SETTING, P33
[5]   Regional Integration Through Contracting Networks An Empirical Analysis of Institutional Collection Action Framework [J].
Andrew, Simon A. .
URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 2009, 44 (03) :378-402
[6]   Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges [J].
Appio, Francesco Paolo ;
Lima, Marcos ;
Paroutis, Sotirios .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 142 :1-14
[7]   Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: the role of creative class and entrepreneurship [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Belitski, Maksim .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 55 (04) :735-756
[8]   The fountain of knowledge: an epistemological perspective on the growth of US SBIR-funded firms [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Link, Albert N. .
INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 15 (04) :1103-1113
[9]  
Audretsch DB, 2016, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V41, P1, DOI [10.1007/s10961-014-9381-8, 10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8]
[10]   Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Belitski, Maksim ;
Desai, Sameeksha .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2015, 55 (01) :33-60