The Czech version of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practice (TEIP) scale: validation and psychometric analysis of the instrument with primary school teachers

被引:2
作者
Pivarc, Jakub [1 ]
机构
[1] Jan Evangelista Purkyne Univ Usti Labem, Fac Educ, Dept Educ & Appl Disciplines, Pasteurova 3544-1, Usti Nad Labem 40096, Czech Republic
关键词
Teacher self-efficacy; inclusive education; Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practice; psychometric analysis; Czech Republic; SELF-EFFICACY; FIT INDEXES; ATTITUDES; EDUCATION; INTENTIONS; CLASSROOMS;
D O I
10.1080/13603116.2024.2371873
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to conduct a detailed psychometric analysis of the Czech version of the internationally used Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices Scale (TEIP) questionnaire. Using a sample of 1434 teachers (N-women 88%) from 140 primary schools in the Czech Republic, a confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the hierarchical structure of the questionnaire with three correlated dimensions representing the general higher-order factor of the TEIP. The 6-item subscales Efficacy in using inclusive instructions, Efficacy in managing behaviour and Efficacy in collaboration (omega >= 0.8) and the overall 18-item TEIP (omega >= 0.9) all showed acceptable reliability. Convergent, discriminant, concurrent, and criterion validity of the TEIP were confirmed. Full strict invariance of the measurements was achieved for the comparison groups of teachers in terms of their age. Overall, perceived self-efficacy was found to be relatively high in relation to the implementation of inclusive practices, with teachers holding special education qualifications scoring higher on the TEIP scale compared to those without such qualifications (d(Cohen) = 0.5). The TEIP was shown to work well in the Czech sociocultural environment and is a reliable tool for (international) comparison and evaluation of teacher self-efficacy regarding teaching in inclusive classrooms.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ainscow M, 2020, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, V6, P7, DOI [10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587, https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587, DOI 10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587, 10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587]
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   Teacher education for inclusive practice - responding to policy [J].
Alexiadou, Nafsika ;
Essex, Jane .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2016, 39 (01) :5-19
[4]   Rasch Analysis of the Japanese Version of Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices Scale: Scale Unidimensionality [J].
Alnahdi, Ghaleb H. ;
Yada, Akie .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
[5]  
Bandura A., 1999, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, DOI [10.1891/08898391.13.2.158, DOI 10.1891/08898391.13.2.158]
[6]   Same Progress for All? Inclusive Education, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities and Students With Intellectual Disability in European Countries [J].
Buchner, Tobias ;
Shevlin, Michael ;
Donovan, Mary-Ann ;
Gercke, Magdalena ;
Goll, Harald ;
Siska, Jan ;
Janyskova, Kristyna ;
Smogorzewska, Joanna ;
Szumski, Grzegorz ;
Vlachou, Anastasia ;
Demo, Heidrun ;
Feyerer, Ewald ;
Corby, Deirdre .
JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 18 (01) :7-22
[7]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[8]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[9]  
Cohen J. W, 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[10]  
De Vaus D., 2002, Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis