Large Language Models and the Future of Organization Theory

被引:11
作者
Cornelissen, Joep [1 ,2 ]
Hollerer, Markus A. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Boxenbaum, Eva [6 ]
Faraj, Samer [7 ]
Gehman, Joel [8 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Burgemeester Oudlaan, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool, England
[3] UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] WU Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[5] Univ Austral, IAE Business Sch, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[6] Copenhagen Business Sch, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[7] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC USA
来源
ORGANIZATION THEORY | 2024年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
AI technology; ChatGPT; large language models; LLM; organization theory; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1177/26317877241239056
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this editorial essay, we explore the potential of large language models (LLMs) for conceptual work and for developing theory papers within the field of organization and management studies. We offer a technically informed, but at the same time accessible, analysis of the generative AI technology behind tools such as Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, to name the most prominent LLMs currently in use. Our aim in this essay is to go beyond prior work and to provide a more nuanced reflection on the possible application of such technology for the different activities and reasoning processes that constitute theorizing within our domain of scholarly inquiry. Specifically, we highlight ways in which LLMs might augment our theorizing, but we also point out the fundamental constraints in how contemporary LLMs 'reason', setting considerable limits to what such tools might produce as 'conceptual' or 'theoretical' outputs. Given worrisome trade-offs in their use, we urge authors to be careful and reflexive when they use LLMs to assist (parts of) their theorizing, and to transparently disclose this use in their manuscripts. We conclude the essay with a statement of Organization Theory's editorial policy on the use of LLMs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   The growing influence of industry in AI research [J].
Ahmed, Nur ;
Wahed, Muntasir ;
Thompson, Neil C. .
SCIENCE, 2023, 379 (6635) :884-886
[2]  
[Anonymous], KNOWLEDGE HUMAN INTE
[3]   We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing [J].
Bailey, Diane E. ;
Faraj, Samer ;
Hinds, Pamela J. ;
Leonardi, Paul M. ;
von Krogh, Georg .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2022, 33 (01) :1-18
[4]   Artificial Intelligence in Medicine [J].
Beam, Andrew L. ;
Drazen, Jeffrey M. ;
Kohane, Isaac S. ;
Leong, Tze-Yun ;
Manrai, Arjun K. ;
Rubin, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 388 (13) :1220-1221
[5]   Prediction of robust scientific facts from literature [J].
Belikov, Alexander, V ;
Rzhetsky, Andrey ;
Evans, James .
NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 4 (05) :445-+
[6]   ChatGPT: five priorities for research [J].
Bockting, Claudi ;
van Dis, Eva A. M. ;
Bollen, Johan ;
van Rooij, Robert ;
Zuidema, Willem L. .
NATURE, 2023, 614 (7947) :224-226
[7]  
Boxenbaum E, 2011, ACAD MANAGE REV, V36, P272
[8]  
Bubeck S, 2023, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2303.12712, 10.48550/ARXIV.2303.12712]
[9]   Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases [J].
Caliskan, Aylin ;
Bryson, Joanna J. ;
Narayanan, Arvind .
SCIENCE, 2017, 356 (6334) :183-186
[10]   What Theory Is and Can Be: Forms of Theorizing in Organizational Scholarship [J].
Cornelissen, Joep ;
Hoellerer, Markus A. ;
Seidl, David .
ORGANIZATION THEORY, 2021, 2 (03)