Application of linaclotide in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with constipation: A prospective randomized controlled study

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Haoxin [1 ]
He, Zhu [2 ]
Liu, Yulin [2 ]
Xu, Hong [2 ]
Liu, Pengfei [3 ]
机构
[1] Second Hosp Longyan, Canc Dept, Longyan, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Hosp Longyan 1, Longyan, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
bowel preparation; colonoscopy; constipation; linaclotide; GUANYLATE-CYCLASE-C; TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE; CECAL INTUBATION; INSERTION TIME; QUALITY; IMPACT; PREDICTORS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.16734
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim Colonoscopy plays a crucial role in the early diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for clear visualization of the colonic mucosa and lesion detection. However, inadequate bowel preparation is common in patients with constipation, and there is no standardized preparation protocol for these patients. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness and tolerability of a pre-colonoscopy combination regimen of linaclotide and polyethylene glycol (PEG). Methods In this prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial, 322 participants were divided into two groups: a 3-L PEG + 870-mu g linaclotide group (administered as a single dose for 3 days) and a 4-L PEG group. The primary endpoints were the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score and the rate of adequate and excellent bowel preparation. Secondary endpoints were the rates of detection of colonic adenomas and polyps, cecal intubation rates, colonoscopy time, adverse reactions, patient satisfaction, and physician satisfaction. Results The study included 319 patients. The 3-L PEG + linaclotide group showed significantly higher rates of adequate and excellent bowel preparation than the 4-L PEG group (89.4% vs 73.6% and 37.5% vs 25.3%, respectively; P < 0.05). The mean BBPS score for the right colon in the 3-L PEG + linaclotide group was significantly higher than that in the 4-L PEG group. There were no significant between-group differences regarding the detection rates of colonic polyps and adenomas (44.4% vs 37.7% and 23.1% vs 20.1%, respectively; P > 0.05). There were no significant between-group differences regarding cecal intubation rates, colonoscopy operation, and withdrawal times. However, patient tolerance and sleep quality were better in the 3-L PEG + linaclotide group. Conclusion The combination of 3-L PEG and 870-mu g linaclotide, because of its lower volume of intake, can be considered as an alternative bowel preparation regimen for constipated patients undergoing colonoscopy, especially for the elderly.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of macrogol 4000 plus electrolytes in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with chronic constipation
    Ichijima, Ryoji
    Suzuki, Sho
    Esaki, Mitsuru
    Sugita, Tomomi
    Ogura, Kanako
    Kusano, Chika
    Ikehara, Hisatomo
    Gotoda, Takuji
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [42] DOUBLE-BLIND PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL TO LACTULOSE FOR BOWEL PREPARATION IN COLONOSCOPY
    Menacho, Aline Moraes
    Reimann, Adriano
    Hirata, Lie Mara
    Ganzerella, Caroline
    Ivano, Flavio Heuta
    Sugisawa, Ricardo
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 27 (01): : 9 - 12
  • [43] Does constipation predict the quality of bowel preparation during colonoscopy?
    Bloom, Peter
    Shustina, Alexandra
    Gaetano, John N.
    Gualtieri, Nicholas
    Tievsky, Dana
    Robilotti, James G.
    FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 1 (03) : 165 - 170
  • [44] Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
    Hernandez, Patricia V.
    Horsley-Silva, Jennifer L.
    Snyder, Diana L.
    Baffy, Noemi
    Atia, Mary
    Koepke, Laura
    Buras, Matthew R.
    Lim, Elisabeth S.
    Ruff, Kevin
    Umar, Sarah B.
    Islam, Sameer
    Ramirez, Francisco C.
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [45] Efficacy of macrogol 4000 plus electrolytes in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with chronic constipation
    Ryoji Ichijima
    Sho Suzuki
    Mitsuru Esaki
    Tomomi Sugita
    Kanako Ogura
    Chika Kusano
    Hisatomo Ikehara
    Takuji Gotoda
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [46] A randomized prospective study comparing the effect of low-volume bowel preparations for colonoscopy preparation in China
    Shen, Jianwei
    Sheng, Hong
    He, Hui
    Sun, Changbo
    Han, Xufeng
    Zhu, Xianjie
    Wang, Chunwei
    Shen, Ruiwei
    Ye, Qunqun
    Yuan, Xiaogang
    Zhao, Qiang
    Yang, Nuonan
    Wang, Jiaqi
    Lu, Ting
    Chen, Dahua
    Chen, Dawei
    Lin, Jieqiong
    Shao, Xiaona
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 59 (09) : 1112 - 1119
  • [47] Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
    Patricia V. Hernandez
    Jennifer L. Horsley-Silva
    Diana L. Snyder
    Noemi Baffy
    Mary Atia
    Laura Koepke
    Matthew R. Buras
    Elisabeth S. Lim
    Kevin Ruff
    Sarah B. Umar
    Sameer Islam
    Francisco C. Ramirez
    BMC Gastroenterology, 20
  • [48] Determining an optimal dose of linaclotide for use in Japanese patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Fukudo, S.
    Nakajima, A.
    Fujiyama, Y.
    Kosako, M.
    Nakagawa, A.
    Akiho, H.
    Nakashima, Y.
    Johnston, J. M.
    Miwa, H.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2018, 30 (05):
  • [49] A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Jin-Seok Park
    Min Su Kim
    HyungKil Kim
    Shin Il Kim
    Chun Ho Shin
    Hyun Jung Lee
    Won Seop Lee
    Soyoung Moon
    BMC Gastroenterology, 16
  • [50] Electrolyte changes after bowel preparation for colonoscopy:A randomized controlled multicenter trial
    Kyong Joo Lee
    Hong Jun Park
    Hyun-Soo Kim
    Kwang Ho Baik
    Yeon Soo Kim
    Sung Chul Park
    Hyun Il Seo
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (10) : 3041 - 3048