Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A nationwide, population-based study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jun Suh [1 ]
Oh, Ha Lynn [2 ]
Yoon, Yoo-Seok [3 ]
Han, Ho-Seong [3 ]
Cho, Jai Young [3 ]
Lee, Hae-Won [3 ]
Lee, Boram [3 ]
Kang, MeeYoung [3 ]
Park, Yeshong [3 ]
Kim, Jinju [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Policy Res Inst, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Wonju, Gangwon do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection is comparable to open pancreatic resection; however, cost-effectiveness analyses of laparoscopic pancreatic resection are scarce. The authors performed a population-based study investigating the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatic resection versus open pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from 9,256 patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy (66.8%) and distal pancreatectomy (33.2%) from 2016 to 2018 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Events after pancreatectomy were categorized as no complication, complication, and death. Probabilities of each event and average cost during index admission and 1 year were utilized to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the cost difference between two interventions divided by quality-adjusted life year. Quality-adjusted life year, a function of length and quality of life, was measured with utility values determined by researching literature. Results: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection was performed in 12.4% of pancreaticoduodenectomies and 53.4% of distal pancreatectomies. For pancreaticoduodenectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection was associated with an increase of 0.0022 quality-adjusted life years for index admission and 0.0023 qualityadjusted life years for 1 year compared with open pancreatic resection. The incremental cost was $321 for index admission and-$1,414 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $147,429 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$614,965 per quality-adjusted life year gained for 1 year. For distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection improved 0.0131 qualityadjusted life years for index admission and 0.0285 quality-adjusted life years for index admission. The incremental cost was-$1,240 for index admission and-$5,875 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of-$94,519 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$206,351 for 1 year. Conclusion: laparoscopic pancreatic resection was a cost-effective alternative to open pancreatic resection for pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, except for the higher cost of index admission for pancreaticoduodenectomy. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness of a population-based AAA screening program for men over 65 years old in Iran
    Daroudi, Rajabali
    Shafe, Omid
    Moosavi, Jamal
    Salimi, Javad
    Bayazidi, Yahya
    Zafarghandi, Mohammad Reza
    Maleki, Majid
    Moini, Majid
    Farshidmehr, Pezhman
    Sadeghipour, Parham
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis
    Sankatsing, Valerie D. V.
    Juraniec, Karolina
    Grimm, Sabine E.
    Joore, Manuela A.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [33] Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Pancreatectomy: Can Preoperative Factors Indicate the Safer Technique?
    Mardin, Wolf Arif
    Schleicher, Christina
    Senninger, Norbert
    Mees, Soeren Torge
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 259 (04) : E60 - E60
  • [34] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study
    Sanket Sharad Mehta
    Ghalia Doumane
    Thibault Mura
    David Nocca
    Jean-Michel Fabre
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 402 - 407
  • [35] Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy
    Vic Velanovich
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2006, 10 : 95 - 98
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness of the treatments for critical limb ischemia in the elderly population
    Peters, Chloe M. L.
    de Vries, Jolanda
    Redeker, Steef
    Timman, Reinier
    van Eijck, Geert-Jan
    Steunenberg, Stijn L.
    Verbogt, Nathalie
    Ho, Gwan H.
    van Busschbach, Jan J.
    van der Laan, Lijckle
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (02) : 530 - +
  • [37] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study
    Mehta, Sanket Sharad
    Doumane, Ghalia
    Mura, Thibault
    Nocca, David
    Fabre, Jean-Michel
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (02): : 402 - 407
  • [38] Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures
    Tiwari, Manish M.
    Reynoso, Jason F.
    High, Robin
    Tsang, Albert W.
    Oleynikov, Dmitry
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (04): : 1127 - 1135
  • [39] Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy
    Velanovich, V
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (01) : 95 - 98
  • [40] The cost-effectiveness of nonoperative management versus laparoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of acute, uncomplicated appendicitis in children
    Wu, James X.
    Sacks, Greg D.
    Dawes, Aaron J.
    DeUgarte, Daniel
    Lee, Steven L.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (07) : 1135 - 1140