Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A nationwide, population-based study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jun Suh [1 ]
Oh, Ha Lynn [2 ]
Yoon, Yoo-Seok [3 ]
Han, Ho-Seong [3 ]
Cho, Jai Young [3 ]
Lee, Hae-Won [3 ]
Lee, Boram [3 ]
Kang, MeeYoung [3 ]
Park, Yeshong [3 ]
Kim, Jinju [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Policy Res Inst, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Wonju, Gangwon do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection is comparable to open pancreatic resection; however, cost-effectiveness analyses of laparoscopic pancreatic resection are scarce. The authors performed a population-based study investigating the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatic resection versus open pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from 9,256 patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy (66.8%) and distal pancreatectomy (33.2%) from 2016 to 2018 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Events after pancreatectomy were categorized as no complication, complication, and death. Probabilities of each event and average cost during index admission and 1 year were utilized to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the cost difference between two interventions divided by quality-adjusted life year. Quality-adjusted life year, a function of length and quality of life, was measured with utility values determined by researching literature. Results: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection was performed in 12.4% of pancreaticoduodenectomies and 53.4% of distal pancreatectomies. For pancreaticoduodenectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection was associated with an increase of 0.0022 quality-adjusted life years for index admission and 0.0023 qualityadjusted life years for 1 year compared with open pancreatic resection. The incremental cost was $321 for index admission and-$1,414 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $147,429 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$614,965 per quality-adjusted life year gained for 1 year. For distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection improved 0.0131 qualityadjusted life years for index admission and 0.0285 quality-adjusted life years for index admission. The incremental cost was-$1,240 for index admission and-$5,875 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of-$94,519 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$206,351 for 1 year. Conclusion: laparoscopic pancreatic resection was a cost-effective alternative to open pancreatic resection for pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, except for the higher cost of index admission for pancreaticoduodenectomy. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study
    Zhang, Yue
    Chen, Xue-Min
    Sun, Dong-Lin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
  • [22] Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Lee, Lawrence
    Sudarshan, Monisha
    Li, Chao
    Latimer, Eric
    Fried, Gerald M.
    Mulder, David S.
    Feldman, Liane S.
    Ferri, Lorenzo E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (12) : 3732 - 3739
  • [23] Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: A randomized study
    Kok, Niels F. M.
    Adang, Eddy M. M.
    Hansson, Birgitta M. E.
    Doopen, Ine M.
    Weimar, Willem
    van der Wilt, Gert-Jan
    IJzermans, Jan N. M.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (12) : 1582 - 1587
  • [24] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study
    Yue Zhang
    Xue-Min Chen
    Dong-Lin Sun
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12
  • [25] Cost Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy in Patients with Colon Cancer: Results from a Large Nationwide Population Database
    Vaid, Sachin
    Tucker, James
    Bell, Ted
    Grim, Rod
    Ahuja, Vanita
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2012, 78 (06) : 635 - 641
  • [26] A meta-analysis of robotic-assisted pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open pancreatectomy
    Chen, Yigang
    Yan, Jun
    Yuan, Ziming
    Yu, Song
    Wang, Zhigang
    Zheng, Qi
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (12) : 1229 - 1236
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic and open surgery in routine Swedish care for colorectal cancer
    Gehrman, Jacob
    Angenete, Eva
    Bjorholt, Ingela
    Lesen, Eva
    Haglind, Eva
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (10): : 4403 - 4412
  • [28] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: A meta-analysis
    Sui, Cheng-Jun
    Li, Bin
    Yang, Jia-Mei
    Wang, Shuang-Jia
    Zhou, Yan-Ming
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 35 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [29] Cost-Effectiveness at Two Years in the VA Open versus Endovascular Repair Trial
    Lederle, F. A.
    Stroupe, K. T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 44 (06) : 543 - 548
  • [30] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Open Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
    Patel, Rohini J.
    Cui, Christina
    Khan, Maryam Ali
    Willie-Permor, Daniel
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 94 : 347 - 355