Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A nationwide, population-based study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jun Suh [1 ]
Oh, Ha Lynn [2 ]
Yoon, Yoo-Seok [3 ]
Han, Ho-Seong [3 ]
Cho, Jai Young [3 ]
Lee, Hae-Won [3 ]
Lee, Boram [3 ]
Kang, MeeYoung [3 ]
Park, Yeshong [3 ]
Kim, Jinju [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Policy Res Inst, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Wonju, Gangwon do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection is comparable to open pancreatic resection; however, cost-effectiveness analyses of laparoscopic pancreatic resection are scarce. The authors performed a population-based study investigating the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatic resection versus open pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from 9,256 patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy (66.8%) and distal pancreatectomy (33.2%) from 2016 to 2018 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Events after pancreatectomy were categorized as no complication, complication, and death. Probabilities of each event and average cost during index admission and 1 year were utilized to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the cost difference between two interventions divided by quality-adjusted life year. Quality-adjusted life year, a function of length and quality of life, was measured with utility values determined by researching literature. Results: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection was performed in 12.4% of pancreaticoduodenectomies and 53.4% of distal pancreatectomies. For pancreaticoduodenectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection was associated with an increase of 0.0022 quality-adjusted life years for index admission and 0.0023 qualityadjusted life years for 1 year compared with open pancreatic resection. The incremental cost was $321 for index admission and-$1,414 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $147,429 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$614,965 per quality-adjusted life year gained for 1 year. For distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection improved 0.0131 qualityadjusted life years for index admission and 0.0285 quality-adjusted life years for index admission. The incremental cost was-$1,240 for index admission and-$5,875 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of-$94,519 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$206,351 for 1 year. Conclusion: laparoscopic pancreatic resection was a cost-effective alternative to open pancreatic resection for pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, except for the higher cost of index admission for pancreaticoduodenectomy. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study
    Mohammad Abu Hilal
    Mohammed Hamdan
    Francesco Di Fabio
    Neil W. Pearce
    Colin D. Johnson
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1670 - 1674
  • [2] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Hamdan, Mohammed
    Di Fabio, Francesco
    Pearce, Neil W.
    Johnson, Colin D.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1670 - 1674
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy
    Carrington, Emma V.
    Hall, Nigel J.
    Pacilli, Maurizio
    Drake, David P.
    Curry, Joseph I.
    Kiely, Edward M.
    De Coppi, Paolo
    Pierro, Agostino
    Eaton, Simon
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 178 (01) : 315 - 320
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness analyses of laparoscopic versus open surgery
    Hottenrott, Christof
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (03): : 990 - 992
  • [5] Evaluation of cost-effectiveness among open, laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Partelli, Stefano
    Ricci, Claudio
    Cinelli, Lorenzo
    Montorsi, Roberto Maria
    Ingaldi, Carlo
    Andreasi, Valentina
    Crippa, Stefano
    Alberici, Laura
    Casadei, Riccardo
    Falconi, Massimo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 222 (03) : 513 - 520
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: cost-effectiveness analysis
    Gosselin-Tardif, A.
    Abou-Khalil, M.
    Mata, J.
    Guigui, A.
    Cools-Lartigue, J.
    Ferri, L.
    Lee, L.
    Mueller, C.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (05): : 830 - 839
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for oral cancer in India: an economic modelling study
    Dwivedi, Pooja
    Lohiya, Ayush
    Bahuguna, Pankaj
    Singh, Ankita
    Sulaiman, Dahy
    Singh, Manish Kumar
    Rajsekar, Kavitha
    Rizwan, Suliankatchi Abdulkader
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - SOUTHEAST ASIA, 2023, 16
  • [8] Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Regis Souche
    Astrid Herrero
    Guillaume Bourel
    John Chauvat
    Isabelle Pirlet
    Françoise Guillon
    David Nocca
    Frederic Borie
    Gregoire Mercier
    Jean-Michel Fabre
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 3562 - 3569
  • [9] Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Souche, Regis
    Herrero, Astrid
    Bourel, Guillaume
    Chauvat, John
    Pirlet, Isabelle
    Guillon, Francoise
    Nocca, David
    Borie, Frederic
    Mercier, Gregoire
    Fabre, Jean-Michel
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (08): : 3562 - 3569
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis A population-based study
    Noyes, K.
    Bajorska, A.
    Chappel, A.
    Schwid, S. R.
    Mehta, L. R.
    Weinstock-Guttman, B.
    Holloway, R. G.
    Dick, A. W.
    NEUROLOGY, 2011, 77 (04) : 355 - 363