The processing of verbal memories after traumatic brain injury

被引:0
作者
Ponsford, Jennie L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Portelli, Pagan [1 ,2 ]
Vakil, Eli [4 ,5 ]
Downing, Marina G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Epworth Rehabil Res Ctr, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Psychol, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Bar Ilan Univ, Leslie & Susan Gonda Goldschmied Multidisciplinary, Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; memory; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LEARNING TEST; CONSOLIDATION DEFICITS; SELF-AWARENESS; MODERATE; PERFORMANCE; MILD; IMPAIRMENTS; VALIDATION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1080/13854046.2024.2374043
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Memory dysfunction is a persistent cognitive symptom following traumatic brain injury (TBI), negatively impacting capacity for independent living and productivity. Traditional scoring of neuropsychological memory tests does not allow for differentiation of specific impairments of encoding, consolidation and/or retrieval, or the potential impact of strategy deficits. Method: The current study examined performance of 142 moderate-to-severe TBI participants and 68 demographically matched healthy controls on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) using Item Specific Data Analysis (ISDA) and strategy use analyses. Results: Results revealed significantly greater impairments in encoding, consolidation, and retrieval in TBI participants, compared to controls. Encoding deficits significantly explained the most variance in the long-delayed recall of TBI participants, followed by consolidation, and then retrieval. Participants with TBI showed a reduced ability to spontaneously apply strategies during learning, evident in decreased subjective clusters and increased word omissions, compared to controls. No difference was found between groups in passive learning strategy application, shown through serial clustering. Spontaneous strategy measures both uniquely accounted for variance in the encoding ability of TBI participants. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential value in using ISDA and strategy use measures to assess RAVLT results to better characterize individual memory profiles and inform rehabilitative interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 116
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   California Verbal Learning Test: performance by patients with focal frontal and non-frontal lesions [J].
Alexander, MP ;
Stuss, DT ;
Fansabedian, N .
BRAIN, 2003, 126 :1493-1503
[2]   Differences in visual vs. verbal memory impairments as a result of focal temporal lobe damage in patients with traumatic brain injury [J].
Ariza, Mar ;
Pueyo, Roser ;
Junque, Carme ;
Mataro, Maria ;
Antonia Poca, Maria ;
Pau Mena, Maria ;
Sahuquillo, Juan .
BRAIN INJURY, 2006, 20 (10) :1053-1059
[3]  
Baddeley A.D., 1999, Essentials of human memory
[4]   Motivation and neuropsychological test performance following mild head injury [J].
Binder, LM ;
Kelly, MP ;
Villanueva, MR ;
Winslow, MM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 25 (03) :420-430
[5]  
Blachstein H., 1993, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V7, P530, DOI DOI 10.1037/0894-4105.7.4.530
[6]   Life span strategy implementation in verbal learning: size and type of cluster adoption [J].
Blachstein, Haya ;
Vakil, Eli .
AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2022, 29 (06) :965-984
[7]   Delayed-onset deficits in verbal encoding strategies among patients with mild traumatic brain injury [J].
Bruce, JM ;
Echemendia, RJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) :622-629
[8]   A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons [J].
Chen, Shi-Yi ;
Feng, Zhe ;
Yi, Xiaolian .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (06) :1725-1729
[9]   Lifetime prevalence of traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness [J].
Corrigan, John D. ;
Yang, Jingzhen ;
Singichetti, Bhavna ;
Manchester, Kara ;
Bogner, Jennifer .
INJURY PREVENTION, 2018, 24 (06) :396-404
[10]   Patterns of verbal learning and memory in traumatic brain injury [J].
Curtiss, G ;
Vanderploeg, RD ;
Spencer, J ;
Salazar, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 7 (05) :574-585