Standing up for close others: the relationship effect on moral courage across care and fairness contexts

被引:1
作者
Nudelman, Gabriel [1 ]
Chen, Yongyuan [2 ]
Wu, Michael Shengtao [3 ]
机构
[1] Acad Coll Tel Aviv Yaffo, Sch Behav Sci, Yaffo, Israel
[2] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Natl Inst Social Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Sch Sociol & Anthropol, 422 Siming South Rd, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
moral courage; close relationships; anger; care; fairness; valent & iacute; a moral; relaciones cercanas; indignaci & oacute; n; cuidado; equidad; BYSTANDER INTERVENTION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; HELPING-BEHAVIOR; EMOTIONS; ATTACHMENT; EVOLUTION; IDENTITY; VIOLENCE; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/02134748241249890
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Moral courage is defined as standing up for others and intervening when a norm is violated. This research aimed to examine the effect of relationship type between the bystander and the victim (close or distant) and the moral context in which the norm violation occurs (care/harm or fairness/reciprocity) on moral courage. Two studies (n = 164 and n = 200) utilized a scenario method in which participants were presented with short vignettes of another person (close or distant) being victimized (in either a care or a fairness context) and were asked to indicate their willingness to intervene, representing degree of moral courage. As expected, participants reported greater levels of moral courage when the victim was their family member or friend (vs. stranger) and this effect was stronger in the care (vs. fairness) context. Moreover, anger - a moral emotion - mediated the relationship effect on moral courage in both contexts. Consequently, relationship type and context should be considered when addressing interventions against norm violations.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 375
页数:29
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   The Bystander-Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review on Bystander Intervention in Dangerous and Non-Dangerous Emergencies [J].
Fischer, Peter ;
Krueger, Joachim I. ;
Greitemeyer, Tobias ;
Vogrincic, Claudia ;
Kastenmueller, Andreas ;
Frey, Dieter ;
Heene, Moritz ;
Wicher, Magdalena ;
Kainbacher, Martina .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2011, 137 (04) :517-537
[22]   Heroism: A Conceptual Analysis and Differentiation Between Heroic Action and Altruism [J].
Franco, Zeno E. ;
Blau, Kathy ;
Zimbardo, Philip G. .
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 15 (02) :99-113
[23]   The Evolution and Social Dynamics of Compassion [J].
Gilbert, Paul .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2015, 9 (06) :239-254
[24]   THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY - A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT [J].
GOULDNER, AW .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1960, 25 (02) :161-178
[25]   Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations [J].
Graham, Jesse ;
Haidt, Jonathan ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (05) :1029-1046
[26]   Civil courage and helping behavior - Differences and similarities [J].
Greitemeyer, Tobias ;
Fischer, Peter ;
Kastenmueller, Andreas ;
Frey, Dieter .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 11 (02) :90-98
[27]   The new synthesis in moral psychology [J].
Haidt, Jonathan .
SCIENCE, 2007, 316 (5827) :998-1002
[28]  
Haidt Jonathan, 2007, Social Justice Research, V20, P98, DOI [10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z, DOI 10.1007/S11211-007-0034-Z]
[29]   Anger as driving factor of moral courage in comparison with guilt and global mood: A multimethod approach [J].
Halmburger, Anna ;
Baumert, Anna ;
Schmitt, Manfred .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) :39-51
[30]  
Hayes A. F., Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis