Mean Block Size Prediction in Rock Blast Fragmentation Using TPE-Tree-Based Model Approach with SHapley Additive exPlanations

被引:1
作者
Mame, Madalitso [1 ]
Qiu, Yingui [1 ]
Huang, Shuai [1 ]
Du, Kun [1 ]
Zhou, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
关键词
Mean block size; Extra-trees model; Random forest model; CatBoost model; Tree-structured Parzen estimator; SHAP; PARTICLE-SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s42461-024-01057-4
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
The optimum fragmentation size measures the quality of a blasting operation. Boulders or large fragments can result in more costs because they need secondary blasting, while small fragments can result in ore loss and dilution. Therefore, it is very significant to accurately predict the mean block size to reduce production costs and enhance efficiency. Due to the shortfalls of the empirical models, scholars have been inclined toward artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for fragmentation size prediction over the decades. Firstly, in this study, three tree-based models, i.e., the random forest (RF), extra-trees (ET), and CatBoost (CB), are employed for basic prediction. The model uses eight parameters, seven input parameters, and mean block size (MBS) as the output parameter. Secondly, their performance and hyper-parameters were fine-tuned using Bayesian optimization: tree-structured Parzen estimators (TPE) algorithm using Optuna. Among the three models, the TPE-ET model showed superior performance with the following metric scores on the training dataset: 0.9896, 0.0184, and 0.0003, and on the test dataset with the following metric scores: 0.9463, 0.0415, and 0.0017, i.e., R2, RMSE, and MSE, respectively. In conclusion, analysis by the SHapley Additive ExPlanations approach shows that elastic modulus significantly impacts the model's prediction of rock fragmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:2325 / 2340
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Adebola J.M., 2016, J. Environ. Earth Sci, V6, P110
[2]   Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework [J].
Akiba, Takuya ;
Sano, Shotaro ;
Yanase, Toshihiko ;
Ohta, Takeru ;
Koyama, Masanori .
KDD'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2019, :2623-2631
[3]  
Amoako R, 2022, MINING-BASEL, V2, P233, DOI 10.3390/mining2020013
[4]   Application of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering: A state-of-the-art review [J].
Baghbani, Abolfazl ;
Choudhury, Tanveer ;
Costa, Susanga ;
Reiner, Johannes .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2022, 228
[5]  
Bastani O, 2019, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1705.08504, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV:1705.08504]
[6]  
BERGMANN OR, 1973, INT J ROCK MECH MIN, V10, P585, DOI 10.1016/0148-9062(73)90007-7
[7]  
Bergstra J., 2011, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., V24, DOI DOI 10.5555/2986459.2986743
[8]  
Bergstra James, 2013, International Conference on Machine Learning, P115
[9]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[10]   Bagging predictors [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1996, 24 (02) :123-140