Satisfaction and usability of the recombinant chorionic gonadotropin prefilled pen: a survey in Italy

被引:3
作者
Dallagiovanna, Chiara [1 ]
Mensi, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Di Gesaro, Luca [1 ,2 ]
La Vecchia, Irene [1 ]
Reschini, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Infertil Unit, Via M Fanti 6, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Milan, Italy
关键词
assisted reproduction; human chorionic gonadotropin; prefilled pen; survey;
D O I
10.7573/dic.2021-10-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Due to high purity, recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is suitable for subcutaneous injection, and hence for self-administration, in assisted reproduction. To increase usability and reduce the risk of dosing errors, a prefilled pen was produced. We investigated the ease of administration and satisfaction with the product amongst patients and healthcare professionals. Methods: A survey was conducted amongst women with infertility who underwent in vitro fertilization treatments with recombinant hCG to trigger ovulation in various clinics in Italy. Results: A total of 276 Italian women were interviewed. The median score of preference for the prefilled pen in comparison with hCG powder to be reconstituted in the solvent was rated as 9 (range 8-10), and 125 women answered that the prefilled pen had major advantages. Reasons for preference of the prefilled pen were linked to ease of use and safety: avoidance of dosage mistakes and of concern of such, ease of administration, certainty that the drug is correctly taken, safe administration and no anxiety. The procedure for recombinant hCG administration through the prefilled pen was judged as easy by 80% of respondents, with a median score of 9 (range 8-10) for easiness on a 1-10 scale. Out of 276 respondents, 249 (90%) had no problem with the injection. Conclusion: Overall, the respondents reported a favourable perception of the prefilled pen with hCG, which was reported to be easy to use and perceived to prevent dosage mistakes.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Comparative characterisation of a commercial human chorionic gonadotrophin extracted from human urine with a commercial recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin [J].
Bassett, R ;
De Bellis, C ;
Chiacchiarini, L ;
Mendola, D ;
Micangeli, E ;
Minari, K ;
Grimaldi, L ;
Mancinelli, M ;
Mastrangeli, R ;
Bucci, R .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2005, 21 (12) :1969-1976
[2]   Unsuccessful oocyte retrieval: technical artefact or genuine 'empty follicle syndrome'? [J].
Bustillo, M .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (01) :59-67
[3]   Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG) in assisted reproductive technology:: Results of a clinical trial comparing two doses of rhCG (Ovidrel®) to urinary hCG (Profasi®) for induction of final follicular maturation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer [J].
Chang, P ;
Kenley, S ;
Burns, T ;
Denton, G ;
Currie, K ;
DeVane, G ;
O'Dea, L .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (01) :67-74
[4]  
Fatemi HM, 2012, CURR PHARM BIOTECHNO, V13, P392
[5]  
Leao RDF, 2014, CLINICS, V69, P279
[6]   Use of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin in ovulation induction [J].
Ludwig, M ;
Doody, KJ ;
Doody, KM .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (05) :1051-1059
[7]   Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention [J].
Nastri, C. O. ;
Teixeira, D. M. ;
Moroni, R. M. ;
Leitao, V. M. S. ;
Martins, W. P. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (04) :377-393
[8]   The recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin prefilled pen: results of patient and nurse human factors usability testing [J].
Saunders, Helen ;
Schertz, Joan C. ;
Hecker, Clara ;
Lang, Barbara ;
Arriagada, Pablo .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2012, 9 (08) :893-900
[9]  
Trinchard-Lugan I, 2002, Reprod Biomed Online, V4, P106
[10]   Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles [J].
Youssef, Mohamed A. ;
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. ;
Lam, Wai Sun .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (04)