Effect of different tube feeding methods on gastroesophageal reflux features in preterm infants: a pH-impedance monitoring study

被引:0
作者
Martini, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Meneghin, Fabio [3 ]
Aceti, Arianna [1 ,2 ]
Cerchierini, Nadia [2 ]
Beghetti, Isadora [1 ,2 ]
Lista, Gianluca [3 ]
Corvaglia, Luigi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Bologna, Italy
[2] IRCCS AOUBO, Neonatal Intens Care Unit, Bologna, Italy
[3] V Buzzi Childrens Hosp, Neonatol & Neonatal Intens Care Unit, ASST FBF Sacco Buzzi, Milan, Italy
关键词
Continuous tube feeding; Bolus tube feeding; Gastroesophageal reflux; Preterm infants; PH and multiple intraluminal impedance monitoring; DUODENAL MOTOR-RESPONSES; INTRAGASTRIC MILK DRIP; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; BOLUS; ACID; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00431-024-05737-7
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
A stepwise approach is currently considered the best choice to manage gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in preterm infants. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different tube feeding techniques on GER frequency and features in symptomatic tube-fed preterm neonates. Tube-fed infants < 34 weeks' gestation were eligible for this prospective, bicentric, cross-over study if, due to GER symptoms, they underwent a diagnostic 24-h combined pH and multiple intraluminal impedance (pH-MII) monitoring. During the monitoring period, each infant received the same feeding cycle, repeated twice: continuous tube feeding, bolus feeding followed by tube feeding permanence and by tube feeding removal. The impact of these three feeding modalities on pH-MII GER features was assessed. Thirty-one infants were enrolled. Despite a low number of reflux episodes, a significant decrease in total GERs (P < 0.001), in GERs detected by pH monitoring (P < 0.001), and in both acid and non-acid GERs detected by MII (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively) was observed in association with continuous feeding compared to bolus feeds, followed or not by tube feeding removal. Compared to continuous feeding, both bolus feeding modalities were associated with a significantly higher number of proximal GERs (P < 0.001). No difference in any pH-MII parameter was observed in relation to tube feeding persistence after bolus feeding administration. Conclusions: Continuous feeding and boluses may have a different impact on pH-MII GER features in symptomatic tube-fed preterm infants, whereas the permanence of the feeding tube across LES did not seem to worsen GER indexes. What is Known: center dot Due to the functional and anatomical immaturity of the gastrointestinal tract, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is common in preterm infants. center dot A stepwise therapeutical approach which firstly undertakes conservative strategies is the most advisable choice to avoid potentially harmful pharmacological overtreatments in the preterm population. What is New: center dot Continuous feeding and boluses may have a different impact on GER features assessed by pH-MII monitoring in tube-fed preterm infants. center dot The permanence of the feeding tube during or after the feeding period did not seem to worsen GER occurrence.center dot By reducing GER features, especially acid GER, continuous feeding may potentially contribute to limit the need for antiacid medications in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:4755 / 4762
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Relationship between gastric emptying and gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children
    Argon, M
    Duygun, U
    Daglioz, G
    Omür, O
    Demir, E
    Aydogdu, S
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (05) : 262 - 265
  • [2] HAEMORRHAGE FROM PEPTIC ULCER TREATED BY CONTINUOUS INTRAGASTRIC MILK DRIP AND EARLY GENEROUS FEEDING
    ASHBY, DW
    ANDERSON, J
    PEASTON, MJT
    [J]. GUT, 1963, 4 (04) : 344 - &
  • [3] FEEDING AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENTEROINSULAR HORMONE-SECRETION IN THE PRETERM INFANT - EFFECTS OF CONTINUOUS GASTRIC INFUSIONS OF HUMAN-MILK COMPARED WITH INTERMITTENT BOLUSES
    AYNSLEYGREEN, A
    ADRIAN, TE
    BLOOM, SR
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 71 (03): : 379 - 383
  • [4] Duodenal motor responses in preterm infants fed formula with varying concentrations and rates of infusion
    Baker, JH
    Berseth, CL
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1997, 42 (05) : 618 - 622
  • [5] The effects of bolus and continuous nasogastric feeding on gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastric emptying in healthy volunteers: A randomised three-way crossover pilot study
    Bowling, Tim E.
    Cliff, Brett
    Wright, Jeff W.
    Blackshaw, P. Elaine
    Perkins, Alan C.
    Lobo, Dileep N.
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2008, 27 (04) : 608 - 613
  • [6] Effects of Bolus and Continuous Nasogastric Feeding on Gastric Emptying, Small Bowel Water Content, Superior Mesenteric Artery Blood Flow, and Plasma Hormone Concentrations in Healthy Adults A Randomized Crossover Study
    Chowdhury, Abeed H.
    Murray, Kathryn
    Hoad, Caroline L.
    Costigan, Carolyn
    Marciani, Luca
    Macdonald, Ian A.
    Bowling, Timothy E.
    Lobo, Dileep N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (03) : 450 - 457
  • [7] Feeding issues in preterm infants
    Cooke, RJ
    Embleton, ND
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2000, 83 (03): : F215 - F218
  • [8] The frequency of apneas in very preterm infants is increased after non-acid gastro-esophageal reflux
    Corvaglia, L.
    Zama, D.
    Spizzichino, M.
    Aceti, A.
    Mariani, E.
    Capretti, M. G.
    Galletti, S.
    Faldella, G.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2011, 23 (04) : 303 - e152
  • [9] Combined oesophageal impedance-pH monitoring in preterm newborn: comparison of two options for layout analysis
    Corvaglia, L.
    Mariani, E.
    Aceti, A.
    Capretti, M. G.
    Ancora, G.
    Faldella, G.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2009, 21 (10) : 1027 - 1031+e81
  • [10] Does the Use of Pacifier Affect Gastro-Esophageal Reflux in Preterm Infants?
    Corvaglia, Luigi
    Martini, Silvia
    Corrado, Maria Francesca
    Mariani, Elisa
    Legnani, Elena
    Bosi, Isabella
    Faldella, Giacomo
    Aceti, Arianna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2016, 172 : 205 - 208