Avoidable admissions after minimally invasive hysterectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Manorot, Amanda [1 ]
Uppal, Shitanshu [1 ]
de Bear, Olivia [1 ]
Stroup, Cynthia [1 ]
Dalton, Liam [2 ]
Rolston, Aimee [1 ]
McCool, Kevin [3 ]
Reynolds, R. Kevin [1 ]
McLean, Karen [4 ]
Siedel, Jean [1 ]
Straubhar, Alli M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Beaumont Hlth Syst, Royal Oak, MI USA
[4] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Buffalo, NY USA
关键词
Hysterectomy; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2024-005391
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the rate of avoidable admissions following anticipated same-day discharge for patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy and to identify risk factors associated with such admissions. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy between March 2019 and July 2021 for a suspected gynecologic malignancy at a single tertiary care center. Pre-operatively, patients were assessed for same-day discharge versus planned admission. Reasons for day-of-surgery admission despite anticipated same-day discharge were categorized as anesthesia-related, system issues, intra-operative factors, post-operative pain, and social factors. Patients deemed not candidates for same-day discharge were defined as planned admissions. Indications were categorized as necessary or potentially avoidable. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used to summarize the cohort. Results In total, 372 patients were identified: 261 (70.2%) anticipated same-day discharges and 111 (29.8%) planned admissions. Of anticipated same-day discharges, 230/261 (88.1%) were successfully discharged, while 31/261 (11.9%) required admission. Reasons for unplanned admissions were anesthesia-related (14/31, 45.2%), system issues (7/31, 22.6%), intra-operative factors (5/31, 16.1%), post-operative pain (3/31, 9.7%), and social factors (2/31, 6.5%). Among the 111 pre-operatively planned admissions, 81 (73.0%) were necessary due to comorbidities or surgical complexity, while 30 (27.0%) were potentially avoidable because patients could have been optimized for same-day discharge. Opportunities for optimization pre-operatively included comorbidities (13/30, 43.3%), system issues (8/30, 26.7%), social factors (6/30, 20.0%), and provider preference (3/30, 10.0%). Conclusion Most patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy can be safely discharged the same day. Potentially avoidable admissions were primarily related to patient comorbidities that can be better optimized pre-operatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1436
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer
    Wright, Jason D.
    Burke, William M.
    Tergas, Ana I.
    Hou, June Y.
    Huang, Yongmei
    Hu, Jim C.
    Hillyer, Grace Clarke
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (10) : 1087 - +
  • [32] Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease
    Price, Joan T.
    Zimmerman, Lilli D.
    Koelper, Nathan C.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Lee, Sonya
    Butts, Samantha F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (05) : 572.e1 - 572.e10
  • [33] Impact of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology Fellowship Training on Quality Performance Metrics for Hysterectomy
    Shirreff, Lindsay
    Matelski, John J.
    Sunderji, Zahra
    Cipolla, Amanda
    Bougie, Olga
    Shapiro, Jodi
    Po, Leslie K.
    Lee, Sabrina
    Evans, Devon
    Murji, Ally
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2021, 43 (12) : 1364 - 1371
  • [34] Safety of same-day discharge for minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer
    Praiss, Aaron M.
    Chen, Ling
    St Clair, Caryn M.
    Tergas, Ana I.
    Khoury-Collado, Fady
    Hou, June Y.
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Wright, Jason D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (03) : 239.e1 - 239.e11
  • [35] Active versus Passive Voiding Protocols after Same-day Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Ishino, Allyse
    Tucker, Lue-Yen
    Navarrete, Emily
    Hartt, Angeleque
    Stenquist, Asha
    Weintraub, Miranda Ritterman
    Zaritsky, Eve
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 144 - +
  • [36] Prophylactic anticoagulation after minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Bell, Sarah
    Orellana, Taylor
    Garrett, Alison
    Smith, Kenneth
    Kim, Haeyon
    Rosiello, Abigail
    Rush, Shannon
    Berger, Jessica
    Lesnock, Jamie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (12) : 1875 - 1881
  • [37] Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy
    Deepanjana Das
    Allison Carroll
    Margaret Mueller
    Kimberly Kenton
    Christina Lewicky-Gaupp
    Sarah Collins
    Julia Geynisman-Tan
    C. Emi Bretschneider
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 2507 - 2514
  • [38] Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy
    Das, Deepanjana
    Carroll, Allison
    Mueller, Margaret
    Kenton, Kimberly
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Collins, Sarah
    Geynisman-Tan, Julia
    Bretschneider, C. Emi
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (09) : 2507 - 2514
  • [39] Understanding Patient Interest and Preferences for Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Westbay, Lauren C.
    Adams, William
    Wagner, Sarah A.
    Graziano, Scott C.
    Dixon, Alison
    Tipton, Matthew J.
    Yang, Linda C.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2021, 37 (06) : 506 - 511
  • [40] Variations in Procedures for Ureterolysis with Sharp Dissection in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Tanase, Yasuhito
    Kato, Mayumi Kobayashi
    Uno, Masaya
    Ishikawa, Mitsuya
    Kato, Tomoyasu
    GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2022, 11 (03): : 171 - 173