Impact Assessment of Systemic Geometric Distortion in 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation through Three-dimensional Geometric Distortion Phantom on Dosimetric Accuracy for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-only Prostate Treatment Planning

被引:0
作者
Chaknam, Korawig [1 ]
Worapruekjaru, Ladawan [2 ]
Suphaphong, Sithiphong [2 ]
Stansook, Nualjun [2 ]
Sodkokkruad, Prapa [1 ]
Asavaphatiboon, Sawwanee [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost & Therapeut Radiol, Div Diagnost Radiol,Ramathibodi Hosp, 270 Rama Vi Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Dept Diagnost & Therapeut Radiol, Div Radiat Oncol, Fac Med,Ramathibodi Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Dosimetric accuracy; magnetic resonance imaging-only treatment planning; magnetic resonance imaging-simulation; systemic geometric distortion; RADIATION-THERAPY; CHEMICAL-SHIFT; RADIOTHERAPY; REGISTRATION; MRI; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.4103/jmp.jmp_62_24
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiotherapy has emerged as a solution to address registration errors that can lead to missed dose delivery. However, the presence of systemic geometric distortion (SGD) stemming from gradient nonlinearity (GNL) and inhomogeneity of the main magnetic field (B0) necessitates consideration. This study aimed to quantitatively assess residual SGD in 1.5T MRI simulation using a three-dimensional (3D) geometric distortion phantom and evaluate its impact on dosimetric accuracy for retrospective prostate cancer patients.Materials and Methods: Ten retrospective cases of prostate cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) were randomly selected. A geometric distortion phantom was scanned on a 1.5T MRI simulation using a 3D T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence, varying bandwidth (BW), and two-phase-encoding directions. Distortion maps were generated and applied to the original computed tomography (oriCT) plan to create a distorted computed tomography plan (dCT), and a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was observed. Dosimetric accuracy was evaluated by recalculating radiation dose for dCT plans using identical beam parameters as oriCT.Results: The SGD increased with distance from the isocenter in all series. DSC exceeded 0.95 for all plans except the rectum. Regarding GNL's impact on dosimetric accuracy, most mean percentage errors for clinical target volume, planning target volume, and both femurs were under 2% in all plans, except for the bladder and rectum.Conclusion: SGD pre-evaluation is crucial and should be incorporated into a quality assurance program to ensure effective MRI-simulation performance before MRI-only treatment planning for prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 362
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Dosimetric Impact of MRI Distortions: A Study on Head and Neck Cancers [J].
Adjeiwaah, Mary ;
Bylund, Mikael ;
Lundman, Josef A. ;
Soderstrom, Karin ;
Zackrisson, Bjorn ;
Jonsson, Joakim H. ;
Garpebring, Anders ;
Nyholm, Tufve .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 103 (04) :994-1003
[2]   Quantifying the Effect of 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Residual System Distortions and Patient-Induced Susceptibility Distortions on Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer [J].
Adjeiwaah, Mary ;
Bylund, Mikael ;
Lundman, Josef A. ;
Karlsson, Camilla Thellenberg ;
Jonsson, Joakim H. ;
Nyholm, Tufve .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (02) :317-324
[3]   Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy [J].
Alzahrani, Meshal ;
Broadbent, David A. ;
Chuter, Robert ;
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar ;
Jackson, Steven ;
Michael, Hutton ;
Johnstone, Robert, I ;
Shah, Simon ;
Wetscherek, Andreas ;
Chick, H. Joan ;
Wyatt, Jonathan J. ;
McCallum, Hazel Mhairi ;
Speight, Richard .
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 :80-84
[4]  
American College of Radiology, 2015, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Control Manual
[5]   Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images [J].
Baldwin, Lesley N. ;
Wachowicz, Keith ;
Thomas, Steven D. ;
Rivest, Ryan ;
Fallone, B. Gino .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (02) :388-399
[6]   A Systematic Review of the Clinical Implementation of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Planning for External Beam Radiation Therapy [J].
Bird, David ;
Henry, Ann M. ;
Sebag-Montefiore, David ;
Buckley, David L. ;
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar ;
Speight, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (03) :479-492
[7]   Fat and Water Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Bley, Thorsten A. ;
Wieben, Oliver ;
Francois, Christopher J. ;
Brittain, Jean H. ;
Reeder, Scott B. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (01) :4-18
[8]   Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task [J].
Brock, Kristy K. ;
Mutic, Sasa ;
McNutt, Todd R. ;
Li, Hua ;
Kessler, Marc L. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (07) :E43-E76
[9]   Emerging role of MRI in radiation therapy [J].
Chandarana, Hersh ;
Wang, Hesheng ;
Tijssen, R. H. N. ;
Das, Indra J. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 48 (06) :1468-1478
[10]   MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: Techniques to minimize susceptibility artefact [J].
Eustace, S ;
Goldberg, R ;
Williamson, D ;
Melhem, ER ;
Oladipo, O ;
Yucel, EK ;
Jara, H .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (08) :589-594