Comparison of hemodynamic effects of propofol or alfaxalone during induction in dogs

被引:0
作者
Sarotti, Diego [1 ]
Franci, Paolo [2 ]
Oricco, Stefano [3 ]
Rabozzi, Roberto [4 ]
Lardone, Elena [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Vet Fossanese, Cuneo, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Vet Sci, Grugliasco, Italy
[3] Ctr Vet Imperiese, Imperia, Italy
[4] Policlin Vet Roma Sud, Rome, Italy
关键词
alfaxalone; propofol; hemodynamic variation; dog; anesthesia; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; ANESTHESIA; CARDIOPULMONARY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2024.1442670
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This randomized prospective clinical study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of propofol and alfaxalone for the induction of anesthesia in dogs. Thirty-one healthy dogs undergoing various procedures in a private referral center were premedicated with intramuscular acepromazine (0.015 mg/kg) and methadone (0.15 mg/kg). They then received 5 mg/kg of propofol over 30 s for induction, followed by a maintenance dose of 25 mg/kg/h (Group P), or 2 mg/kg of alfaxalone over 30 s for induction, followed by a continuous rate infusion of 10 mg/kg/h (Group A). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and the velocity time integral (VTI) of the aortic blood flow using transthoracic echocardiography were measured before anesthetic induction and every 15 s for 180 s. Dogs not adequately anaesthetized for intubation were excluded from the hemodynamic evaluation. Events of hypotension (any MAP value lower than 60 mmHg) were also recorded. Statistical analyses utilized ANOVA for repeated measures, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, paired t-tests, or Wilcoxon signed rank-test as appropriate. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Two dogs in Group P (2/14) and 3 in Group A (3/17) were excluded from the study because the anesthesia plane was too light to allow intubation. Treatment P resulted in a significant decrease in MAP between 45 and 75 s during the induction period, with no significant variation in HR, VTI, and VTI*HR. In treatment A, HR increases between 60 and 105 s, VTI decreases at 150-180 s. Analysis between groups did not show any difference in MAP (p = 0.12), HR (p = 0.10), VTI (p = 0.22) and VTI*HR (p = 0.74). During induction, hypotension was detected in 3/12 (25%) dogs in Group P and 1/14 (8%) in Group A. In healthy premedicated dogs, propofol and alfaxalone induction produce similar hemodynamic variations. Propofol induction results in a short-term reduction in MAP, whereas alfaxalone induction preserves MAP and cardiac output by significantly increasing heart rate.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy and cardiopulmonary effects of continuous rate infusions of alfaxalone-2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and propofol in dogs [J].
Ambros, Barbara ;
Duke-Novakovski, Tanya ;
Pasloske, Kirby S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2008, 69 (11) :1391-1398
[2]   An evaluation of anaesthetic induction in healthy dogs using rapid intravenous injection of propofol or alfaxalone [J].
Amengual, Maria ;
Flaherty, Derek ;
Auckburally, Adam ;
Bell, Andrew M. ;
Scott, E. Marian ;
Pawson, Patricia .
VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 40 (02) :115-123
[3]   Evaluation and optimisation of a target-controlled infusion system for administering propofol to dogs as part of a total intravenous anaesthetic technique during dental surgery [J].
Beths, T ;
Glen, JB ;
Reid, J ;
Monteiro, AM ;
Nolan, AM .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2001, 148 (07) :198-203
[4]   Effect of rate of administration of propofol or alfaxalone on induction dose requirements and occurrence of apnea in dogs [J].
Bigby, Sarah E. ;
Beths, Thierry ;
Bauquier, Sebastien ;
Carter, Jennifer E. .
VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 44 (06) :1267-1275
[5]   Respiratory variation in aortic blood peak velocity and caudal vena cava diameter can predict fluid responsiveness in anaesthetised and mechanically ventilated dogs [J].
Bucci, M. ;
Rabozzi, R. ;
Guglielmini, C. ;
Franci, P. .
VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 227 :30-35
[6]   Comparison of the effects of propofol and alfaxalone on the electrocardiogram of dogs, with particular reference to QT interval [J].
Casoria, Vincenzo ;
Greet, Victoria ;
Auckburally, Adam ;
Murphy, Steve ;
Flaherty, Derek .
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 10
[7]   Haemodynamic changes during propofol induction in dogs: new findings and approach of monitoring [J].
Cattai, Andrea ;
Rabozzi, Roberto ;
Ferasin, Heidi ;
Isola, Maurizio ;
Franci, Paolo .
BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2018, 14
[8]   Use of aortic flow indexes derived from transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate response to a fluid challenge in anesthetized dogs [J].
de Oliveira, Guillermo C., V ;
Teixeira-Neto, Francisco J. ;
Dalmagro, Tabata L. ;
Alfonso, Angelica ;
Celeita-Rodriguez, Nathalia ;
Lobo, Cesar P. C. ;
Lourenco, Maria L. G. .
VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 48 (02) :187-197
[9]   Plasma pharmacokinetics of alfaxalone in dogs after an intravenous bolus of Alfaxan-CD RTU [J].
Ferre, Pierre J. ;
Pasloske, Kirby ;
Whittem, Ted ;
Ranasinghe, Millagahamanda G. ;
Li, Qiang ;
Lefebvre, Herve P. .
VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 33 (04) :229-236
[10]   The effect of age on the induction dose of propofol for general anesthesia in dogs [J].
Hampton, Chiara E. ;
da Cunha, Anderson ;
Desselle, Amber ;
Queiroz-Williams, Patricia ;
Hofmeister, Erik H. .
PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07)