DETERMINATION OF SUPERIOR BEAN GENOTYPES IN COOKING AND PHYSICAL BY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD

被引:0
|
作者
Karaman, Ruziye [1 ]
Turkay, Cengiz [1 ]
Odabas, Mehmet Serhat [2 ]
机构
[1] Isparta Univ Appl Sci, Agr Fac, Dept Field Crops, Isparta, Turkiye
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Bafra Vocat Sch, Samsun, Turkiye
关键词
Analytical hierarchical process; Cooking characteristics; Legumes; Physical properties; Yield;
D O I
10.17557/tjfc.1373978
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
It is aimed to examine and predict the effects of bean genotypes using cooking and physicochemical properties on seed quality index and yield in this study. The seed quality index was calculated by combining the analytical hierarchical process and standard scoring functions, which is one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods, using the linear combination technique. To determine the seed quality index, a data set was created with 11 indicators. analytical hierarchical process was used to weight importance levels of examined traits depending on the genotypes. Seed quality index of registered cultivars according to investigated characteristics of cultivars and genotypes IV. Class, 6 genotype (Bombay genotype) was found to be in class V. Obtained seed quality and physical properties by determining with seed quality index obtained in this study, estimation of seed quality in beans with analytical hierarchical process was evaluated successfully. As a result, according to seed quality index of bean cultivars and genotypes, it was determined that genotype 6 had superior characteristics in terms of productivity, in addition genotypes 8 with 9 and registered cultivars could also show superior characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 91
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [2] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [3] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [4] A fuzzy multi-criteria emergency decision-making method
    Wu, Wen-Shuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Shi, Yong
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (06): : 1298 - 1304
  • [5] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865
  • [6] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [7] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [8] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [9] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [10] APPLICATIONS OF WASPAS METHOD AS A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (01): : 5 - 22