The Clash of the Policies: The Joint Effect of EU Cohesion Policy and Common Agricultural Policy on the Public Support for European Integration

被引:2
作者
Radojicic, Nikola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilian Univ Munich, Geschwister Scholl Inst Polit Sci, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Inst Polit Sci, Dept Hist & Social Sci, Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
European integration; Cohesion Policy; Common Agricultural Policy; multilevel analysis; Eurobarometer; STRUCTURAL FUNDS; REGIONAL POLICY; UNION; EUROSCEPTICISM; IDENTITY; TRUST; REDISTRIBUTION; BENCHMARKING; INTERESTS; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1111/jcms.13680
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A vital element of the European Union (EU) political system is the idea of further European integration. Whilst most existing works investigate the effects of the Cohesion Policy (CP), only a handful of studies consider the effects of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) on citizens' support for European integration. In this contribution, I argue that these two largest EU redistribution policies neutralise each other in their effects on the citizens' support for European integration: the CP improves public support due to its positively perceived redistributive nature and positive externalities, whilst the CAP decreases public support due to due to a limited target audience, somewhat elitarian distribution of resources and bureaucratic complexities. Using regional-level CP and CAP data for 2017 and Eurobarometer surveys for 2018 and 2019, the empirical findings of multilevel regressions show that the CAP counteracts the positive effects of the CP on citizens' support for further European integration. The findings are robust to including a wide range of control variables, sample size change and alternative specifications of key independent variables. These findings also hint that policy evaluations should not disregard the differences between various policy instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:1080 / 1098
页数:19
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Agri D.G., 2018, TRANSPARENCYWORKING
[2]   European identity and citizens' support for the EU: Testing the utilitarian approach [J].
Aiello, Valentina ;
Reverberi, Pierre Maurice ;
Brasili, Cristina .
REGIONAL SCIENCE POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 11 (04) :673-694
[3]  
Anderson C.J., 1995, Journal of Public Policy, V15, P231, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0143814X00010035
[4]  
ANNONI P., 2013, EU Regional Competitiveness Index, RCI 2013
[5]   The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system [J].
Armingeon, Klaus ;
Ceka, Besir .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2014, 15 (01) :82-107
[6]  
Bailey J., 2021, PREPRINT
[7]   The EU as a savior and a saint? Corruption and public support for redistribution [J].
Bauhr, Monika ;
Charron, Nicholas .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 27 (04) :509-527
[8]  
Bayerlein M., 2022, Kiel Working Paper 2219
[9]   Going NUTS: The effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performance [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Egger, Peter H. ;
von Ehrlich, Maximilian .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2010, 94 (9-10) :578-590
[10]   The effectiveness of structural policy in the European Union: An empirical analysis for the EU-15 in 1995-2001 [J].
Beugelsdijk, M ;
Eijffinger, SCW .
JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2005, 43 (01) :37-51