An ensemble estimate of Australian soil organic carbon using machine learning and process-based modelling

被引:1
作者
Wang, Lingfei [1 ,2 ]
Abramowitz, Gab [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ying-Ping [3 ]
Pitman, Andy [1 ,2 ]
Viscarra Rossel, Raphael A. [4 ]
机构
[1] ARC Ctr Excellence Climate Extremes, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Climate Change Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] CSIRO Environm, Melbourne, Vic 3169, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Sch Mol & Life Sci, Fac Sci & Engn, Soil & Landscape Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
EARTH SYSTEM MODELS; PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS; SEMIARID RANGELANDS; CLIMATE; SEQUESTRATION; STORAGE; CLASSIFICATION; FRACTIONS; MATTER; LAND;
D O I
10.5194/soil-10-619-2024
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Spatially explicit prediction of soil organic carbon (SOC) serves as a crucial foundation for effective land management strategies aimed at mitigating soil degradation and assessing carbon sequestration potential. Here, using more than 1000 in situ observations, we trained two machine learning models (a random forest model and a k-means coupled with multiple linear regression model) and one process-based model (the vertically resolved MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization, MIMICS, model) to predict the SOC stocks of the top 30 cm of soil in Australia. Parameters of MIMICS were optimised for different site groupings using two distinct approaches: plant functional types (MIMICS-PFT) and the most influential environmental factors (MIMICS-ENV). All models showed good performance with respect to SOC predictions, with an R2 value greater than 0.8 during out-of-sample validation, with random forest being the most accurate; moreover, it was found that SOC in forests is more predictable than that in non-forest soils excluding croplands. The performance of continental-scale SOC predictions by MIMICS-ENV is better than that by MIMICS-PFT especially in non-forest soils. Digital maps of terrestrial SOC stocks generated using all of the models showed a similar spatial distribution, with higher values in south-eastern and south-western Australia, but the magnitude of the estimated SOC stocks varied. The mean ensemble estimate of SOC stocks was 30.3 t ha-1, with k-means coupled with multiple linear regression generating the highest estimate (mean SOC stocks of 38.15 t ha-1) and MIMICS-PFT generating the lowest estimate (mean SOC stocks of 24.29 t ha-1). We suggest that enhancing process-based models to incorporate newly identified drivers that significantly influence SOC variation in different environments could be the key to reducing the discrepancies in these estimates. Our findings underscore the considerable uncertainty in SOC estimates derived from different modelling approaches and emphasise the importance of rigorous out-of-sample validation before applying any one approach in Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 636
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling the spatiotemporal dynamics of cropland soil organic carbon by integrating process-based models differing in structures with machine learning
    Zhang, Xiu
    Xie, Enze
    Chen, Jian
    Peng, Yuxuan
    Yan, Guojing
    Zhao, Yongcun
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2023, 23 (07) : 2816 - 2831
  • [2] Divergent controls of soil organic carbon between observations and process-based models
    Georgiou, Katerina
    Malhotra, Avni
    Wieder, William R.
    Ennis, Jacqueline H.
    Hartman, Melannie D.
    Sulman, Benjamin N.
    Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw
    Grandy, A. Stuart
    Kyker-Snowman, Emily
    Lajtha, Kate
    Moore, Jessica A. M.
    Pierson, Derek
    Jackson, Robert B.
    BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 156 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [3] Scale and uncertainty in modeled soil organic carbon stock changes for US croplands using a process-based model
    Ogle, Stephen M.
    Breidt, F. Jay
    Easter, Mark
    Williams, Steve
    Killian, Kendrick
    Paustian, Keith
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2010, 16 (02) : 810 - 822
  • [4] Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon Stock in the Moroccan High Atlas Using Machine Learning
    Meliho, Modeste
    Boulmane, Mohamed
    Khattabi, Abdellatif
    Dansou, Caleb Efelic
    Orlando, Collins Ashianga
    Mhammdi, Nadia
    Noumonvi, Koffi Dodji
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [5] Assessing countrywide soil organic carbon stock using hybrid machine learning modelling and legacy soil data in Cameroon
    Silatsa, Francis B. T.
    Yemefack, Martin
    Tabi, Fritz O.
    Heuvelink, Gerard B. M.
    Leenaars, Johan G. B.
    GEODERMA, 2020, 367
  • [6] Improving pedotransfer functions for predicting soil mineral associated organic carbon by ensemble machine learning
    Xiao, Yi
    Xue, Jie
    Zhang, Xianglin
    Wang, Nan
    Hong, Yongsheng
    Jiang, Yefeng
    Zhou, Yin
    Teng, Hongfen
    Hu, Bifeng
    Lugato, Emanuele
    Richer-de-Forges, Anne C.
    Arrouays, Dominique
    Shi, Zhou
    Chen, Songchao
    GEODERMA, 2022, 428
  • [7] Optimizing process-based models to predict current and future soil organic carbon stocks at high-resolution
    Pierson, Derek
    Lohse, Kathleen A.
    Wieder, William R.
    Patton, Nicholas R.
    Facer, Jeremy
    de Graaff, Marie-Anne
    Georgiou, Katerina
    Seyfried, Mark S.
    Flerchinger, Gerald
    Will, Ryan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [8] Machine learning in space and time for modelling soil organic carbon change
    Heuvelink, Gerard B. M.
    Angelini, Marcos E.
    Poggio, Laura
    Bai, Zhanguo
    Batjes, Niels H.
    van den Bosch, Rik
    Bossio, Deborah
    Estella, Sergio
    Lehmann, Johannes
    Olmedo, Guillermo F.
    Sanderman, Jonathan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2021, 72 (04) : 1607 - 1623
  • [9] Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate Soil Organic Carbon Variability with Environmental Variables and Soil Nutrient Indicators in an Alluvial Soil
    John, Kingsley
    Abraham Isong, Isong
    Michael Kebonye, Ndiye
    Okon Ayito, Esther
    Chapman Agyeman, Prince
    Marcus Afu, Sunday
    LAND, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 20
  • [10] Learning vs. understanding: When does artificial intelligence outperform process-based modeling in soil organic carbon prediction?
    Bernardini, Luca G.
    Rosinger, Christoph
    Bodner, Gernot
    Keiblinger, Katharina M.
    Izquierdo-Verdiguier, Emma
    Spiegel, Heide
    Retzlaff, Carl O.
    Holzinger, Andreas
    NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 81 : 20 - 31