Risk Management in the Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Central Government Settings in France, Germany, and Italy

被引:0
作者
Gourbier, Leonard [1 ]
Iacuzzi, Silvia [2 ]
Padovani, Emanuele [3 ]
Saliterer, Iris [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 09, Dauphine Res Management, MOST Pl Marechal Lattre Tassigny, Paris, France
[2] Univ Udine, Dipartimento Sci Econ & Stat, Udine, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Management, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Freiburg, Inst Publ & Nonprofit Management, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
central government; internal control; public sector; regulatory framework; risk management; INTERNAL CONTROL; ACCOUNTABILITY; GOVERNANCE; AUSTERITY;
D O I
10.1111/faam.12416
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In recent years, public organizations have come under increasing pressure to implement comprehensive risk management (RM) systems that are based on international frameworks and standards. However, little is known about whether different countries have addressed this issue in their regulatory strategies and how they have done so. To address this gap, this study conducts a cross-country analysis and introduces and applies an analytical framework to compare the different RM approaches adopted by the central governments of France, Germany, and Italy. This comparison sheds light on the regulatory landscape in the three largest countries in the European Union and reveals the diverse RM frameworks with varying focuses, drivers, designs, and levels of integration. Although each country has unique nuances in its approaches, commonality is the primary perception of risk as a threat. This stance, although understandable in the context of financial risks, calls for a shift toward viewing risk as an opportunity, thus promoting a balanced approach that goes beyond mere compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 307
页数:15
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Risk management practices and trade facilitation as influenced by public sector reforms: institutional isomorphism [J].
Alsharari, Nizar Mohammad .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, 2022, 18 (02) :192-216
[2]   Reconsidering public budgeting after the COVID-19 outbreak: key lessons and future challenges [J].
Anessi-Pessina, Eugenio ;
Barbera, Carmela ;
Langella, Cecilia ;
Manes-Rossi, Francesca ;
Sancino, Alessandro ;
Sicilia, Mariafrancesca ;
Steccolini, Ileana .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC BUDGETING ACCOUNTING & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 32 (05) :957-965
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Quality of public administration: a tool box for practitioners
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Enterprise risk management framework
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GUIDELINES INTERNAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Position Paper: The Three Lines of Defense in Effective Risk Management and Control
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Enterprise Risk Management - Applying Enterprise Risk Management to Environmental, Social and Governance-Related Risks
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Management's responsibility for enterprise risk management and internal control
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework Principles
[10]   The organizational dynamics of Enterprise Risk Management [J].
Arena, Marika ;
Arnaboldi, Michela ;
Azzone, Giovanni .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2010, 35 (07) :659-675