Curriculum Design Orientations Preference Scale of Teachers: Validity and Reliability Study

被引:0
|
作者
Bas, Gokhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Grad Sch Educ Sci, Dept Educ Sci Curriculum & Instruct, Konya, Turkey
来源
KURAM VE UYGULAMADA EGITIM BILIMLERI | 2013年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
Curriculum; Curriculum Design Orientations; Teachers; Scale Development; BELIEFS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable scale for preferences of teachers in regard of their curriculum design orientations. Because there was no scale development study similar to this one in Turkey, it was considered as an urgent need to develop such a scale in the study. The sample of the research consisted of 300 elementary and high school teachers, working in Nigde province and its districts, selected according to cluster sampling method. In light of the scales obtained from the related literature and other information, a pool consisting of 35 items were formed by the researcher. Then, the first form of the scale was presented into the views of a group of field experts for content validity. In order to test the validity of the scale, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out in the research. A result of the exploratory factor analysis, the scale consisted of three factors: (i) subject-centred curriculum design orientation, (ii) student-centred learner-centred) curriculum design orientation, and (iii) problem-centred curriculum design orientation with 30 items. KMO value of the scale was found as 0.93 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was found as 3051.295/df=435 in the study. Besides, the factor loadings of the scale were found to be ranged from 0.81 to 0.45 and item-total correlation values were found between 0.71 and 0.49. Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient value was found as 0.94 and Spearman-Brown split-half correlation value was found as 0.91. It was seen that reliability coefficient values of the factors of in the scale ranged between 0.89 and 0.87 in the research. Also, it was understood that there were positive correlations amongst the factors of the scale. The confirmatory factor analysis was applied on the three-factor structure obtained from the scale's exploratory factor analysis on a group of 320 teachers, similar to the sample group of the study. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, it was understood that the obtained values [X2/df=604.02/402; GFI=0.83; AGFI=0.80; RMSEA=0.05; CFI=0.90; NFI=0.77; NNFI=0.89; RMR=0.077; SRMR=0.056], confirmed the three-factor structure of the scale. Thus, according to the results obtained in the research, it could be said that the scale developed in this study is a valid and reliable scale to be used both by elementary and high school teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 992
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Teacher Efficacy Scale: A Reliability and Validity Study
    Nie, Youyan
    Lau, Shun
    Liau, Albert K.
    ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 2012, 21 (02) : 414 - 420
  • [22] Academic Jealousy Scale: Validity and Reliability Study
    Kocak, Duygu
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2019, 10 (04): : 467 - 479
  • [23] Teachers' curriculum adaptation patterns: a scale development study
    Yazicilar, Nalbantoglu Umran
    Bumen, Nilay T.
    Uslu, Oner
    TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 26 (01) : 94 - 116
  • [24] Locus of control scale: Scale development, reliability and validity study
    Dag, I
    TURK PSIKOLOJI DERGISI, 2002, 17 (49): : 77 - 92
  • [25] Emotional Labor Scale: A Study of Scale Development, Reliability and Validity
    Pala, Tugba
    Surgevil, Olca
    EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 2016, 16 (04) : 773 - 787
  • [26] A RATING-SCALE FOR TUTOR EVALUATION IN A PROBLEM-BASED CURRICULUM - VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY
    DOLMANS, DHJM
    WOLFHAGEN, IHAP
    SCHMIDT, HG
    VANDERVLEUTEN, CPM
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1994, 28 (06) : 550 - 558
  • [27] Developing an Earthquake Anxiety Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
    Bayram, Hueseyin
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2024, (62):
  • [28] Simulation acceptance scale (SAS): A validity and reliability study
    Sezer, Baris
    Teker, Gulsen Tasdelen
    Sezer, Tufan Asli
    Elcin, Melih
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 36 (03) : 56 - 68
  • [29] The flipped learning perception scale: A validity and reliability study
    Fatmanur Ekinci
    Oktay Bektaş
    Melek Karaca
    Kübra Nur Yiğit
    Education and Information Technologies, 2023, 28 : 14139 - 14166
  • [30] The flipped learning perception scale: A validity and reliability study
    Ekinci, Fatmanur
    Bektas, Oktay
    Karaca, Melek
    Yigit, Kuebra Nur
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 28 (11) : 14139 - 14166