A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system

被引:0
|
作者
Plush, Kate [1 ]
Lines, David [1 ]
Staveley, Lauren [1 ]
D'Souza, Darryl [1 ]
van Barneveld, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] SunPork Grp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
sow; welfare; farrowing; lactation; piglet; Maternity Ring; BEHAVIOR; PIGLETS; CRATES; ENVIRONMENT; LACTATION; PATTERNS; SURVIVAL; LESIONS; MODELS; PENS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2024.1339947
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The Maternity Ring was developed as a free farrowing alternative to crates that preserved space whilst providing the sow with unrestricted movement. This experiment aimed to apply the Five Domains model to assess sow welfare in the Maternity Ring in comparison with the farrowing crate. Eighty-eight sows were housed in a farrowing crate (FC) and 83 in a Maternity Ring (MR), and measures collected focussed on nutrition, environment, health, behaviour, and mental state outcomes. MR sows consumed less feed than FC sows (total feed intake: 93.8 +/- 3.06 kg vs. 111.2 +/- 3.13 kg; p < 0.001) but had reduced P2 backfat loss during lactation (0.0 +/- 0.11 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.11, p < 0.001). Fewer frustrated and pain-related behaviours during farrowing were observed in MR sows (bar biting: FC 3.3 +/- 2.12 vs. MR 0.5 +/- 0.29 events, p = 0.038, and back leg forward: FC 227 +/- 50.7 vs. MR 127 +/- 26.4 events, p = 0.019), and a decreased proportion of MR sows had facial injuries after farrowing (10% CI [5, 20] vs. 67% CI [47, 95], p < 0.001). More FC sows had udder damage at weaning (70% CI [48, 97] vs. 10% CI [6, 24], p < 0.001), and their piglets were medicated more frequently when compared to those in MR (51% CI [40, 61] vs. 30% [21, 41], p = 0.008). MR sows tended to have a higher reaction score to piglet processing (MR 2.0 +/- 0.38 vs. FC 1.2 +/- 0.27, p = 0.094) and had more contact with piglets once the procedure was complete than FC sows (13.5 +/- 2.55 vs. 6.9 +/- 1.26 events, respectively, p = 0.016). Whilst there was no difference in anticipation of a feeding event (p > 0.05), MR sows displayed a reduced startle response to an aversive noise stimulus at day 18 (FC 2.8 +/- 0.35, MR 0.7 +/- 0.16, p < 0.001). Using the Five Domains framework, sows housed in the MR during farrowing and lactation have improved welfare than those in FC and can be thought of as being in a positive affective state.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The agency domain and behavioral interactions: assessing positive animal welfare using the Five Domains Model
    Littlewood, Katherine E.
    Heslop, Morgan V.
    Cobb, Mia L.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [42] A Systematic Review on Management Practices Affecting Welfare in Male Calves: A Five Domains Model Approach
    Tuberquia-lopez, Brahian Camilo
    Hernandez, Natalia Alvarez
    Valencia, Nathalia M. Correa
    ACTA VETERINARIA EURASIA, 2024, 50 (03): : 218 - 229
  • [43] Iceberg Indicators for Animal Welfare in Rural Sheep Farms Using the Five Domains Model Approach
    Obrian Hernandez, Rick
    Alberto Sanchez, Jorge
    Romero, Marlyn H.
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (12): : 1 - 16
  • [44] Pilot-Scale Assessment of a Novel Farrowing Creep Area Supplementary Heat Source
    Smith, Benjamin C.
    Ramirez, Brett C.
    Hoff, Steven J.
    Greiner, Laura L.
    ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [45] Assessing Animal Welfare Risk in Fibre-Producing Animals by Applying the Five Domains Framework
    Salobir, Kaja
    Kirchner, Marlene Katharina
    Haager, Daniela
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (23):
  • [46] Towards the creation of a welfare assessment system in intensive beef cattle farms
    Gottardo, Flaviana
    Brscic, Marta
    Contiero, Barbara
    Cozzi, Giulio
    Andrighetto, Igino
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 8 : 325 - 342
  • [47] Practical Application of the Five Domains Animal Welfare Framework for Supply Food Animal Chain Managers
    Grandin, Temple
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (20):
  • [48] The transect method: a novel approach to on-farm welfare assessment of commercial turkeys
    Marchewka, Joanna
    Estevez, Inma
    Vezzoli, Giuseppe
    Ferrante, Valentina
    Makagon, Maja M.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2015, 94 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [49] Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare
    McGreevy, Paul
    Berger, Jeannine
    de Brauwere, Nic
    Doherty, Orla
    Harrison, Anna
    Fiedler, Julie
    Jones, Claudia
    McDonnell, Sue
    McLean, Andrew
    Nakonechny, Lindsay
    Nicol, Christine
    Preshaw, Liane
    Thomson, Peter
    Tzioumis, Vicky
    Webster, John
    Wolfensohn, Sarah
    Yeates, James
    Jones, Bidda
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [50] The good, the bad, the comfortable: a review of welfare practices and indicators based on the five domains model in farmed deer
    Esattore, Bruno
    Bartosova, Hana
    Bartosova, Jitka
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2024,