Lessons Learned From Shared Decision-Making With OralAnticoagulants:Viewpoint on Suggestions for the Developmentof Oral Chemotherapy Decision Aids

被引:0
|
作者
McLoughlin, Daniel E. [1 ]
Echevarria, Fabiola M. Moreno [1 ]
Badawy, Sherif M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, 420 E Super St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Div Hematol Oncol & Stem Cell Transplant, Chicago, IL USA
来源
JMIR CANCER | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
shared decision-making; SDM; decision aids; decision aids design; oral chemotherapy; oral anticoagulants; drug delivery; chemotherapy; chemo; anticoagulants; drug deliveries; cancer; oncology; oncologist; metastases; literature review; literature reviews; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; INFORMATION; PROVIDERS; LIFE;
D O I
10.2196/56935
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Oral chemotherapy is commonly prescribed, and by using decision aids (DAs), clinicians can facilitate shared decision-making(SDM) to align treatment choices with patient goals and values. Although products exist commercially, little evidence informsthe development of DAs targeting the unique challenges of oral chemotherapy. To address this gap in the literature, our objectivewas to review DAs developed for oral anticoagulation, DA use in oncology, and patient preference surveys to guide the developmentof DAs for oral chemotherapy. We focused on reviewing SDM, patient preferences, and specifically the development, efficacy,and patient experience of DAs in oral anticoagulation and oncologic conditions, ultimately including conclusions and data from30 peer-reviewed publications in our viewpoint paper. We found that effective DAs in oral anticoagulation improved knowledge,lowered decisional conflict, increased adherence, and covered a broad range of SDM elements; however, limited information onpatient experience was a common shortcoming. In oncology, DAs increased knowledge and aligned decisions with the values ofthe patients. Ineffective oncology DAs provided general, unclear, or overly optimistic information, while providing "too much"information was not shown to do harm. Patients preferred DAs that included pros and cons, side effects, questions to ask, andexpected quality of life changes. In developing DAs for oral chemotherapy, patients should be included in the developmentprocess, and DA content should be specifically tailored to patient preferences. Providing DAs ahead of appointments provedmore effective than during, and additional considerations included addressing barriers to efficacy. There is a need for evidence-basedDAs to facilitate SDM for patients considering oral chemotherapy. Developers should use data from studies in oral anticoagulation,oncology, and preference surveys to optimize SDM.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Protocol for a systematic review of randomized trials of knee arthroplasty decision aids and shared decision-making approaches
    Daniel L. Riddle
    Trisha Sando
    Talicia Tarver
    James Slover
    Robert A. Perera
    Rafael Sierra
    Juan P. Brito
    Victor M. Montori
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [42] A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
    Thomas H. Wieringa
    Marleen Kunneman
    Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez
    Victor M. Montori
    Maartje de Wit
    Ellen M. A. Smets
    Linda J. Schoonmade
    Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla
    Frank J. Snoek
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [43] A formalized shared decision-making process with individualized decision aids for older patients referred for cardiac surgery
    Gainer, Ryan A.
    Buth, Karen
    Begum, Jahanara
    Hirsch, Gregory M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 67 (01) : E7 - E15
  • [44] First the facts, then the values? Implicit normativity inevidence-based decision aids for shared decision-making
    Molewijk, Bert
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Otten, Wilma
    Dupuis, Heleen M.
    Kievit, Job
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2008, 102 (07): : 415 - 420
  • [45] A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol
    Wieringa, Thomas H.
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
    Montori, Victor M.
    de Wit, Maartje
    Smets, Ellen M. A.
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
    Snoek, Frank J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [46] Impact of Patients Decision Aids on Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction Prior to Pelvic Floor Surgery
    Athey, Ruth
    Bugeja, Roberta
    Jones, Georgina
    Jha, Swati
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2025,
  • [47] Protocol for a systematic review of randomized trials of knee arthroplasty decision aids and shared decision-making approaches
    Riddle, Daniel L.
    Sando, Trisha
    Tarver, Talicia
    Slover, James
    Perera, Robert A.
    Sierra, Rafael
    Brito, Juan P.
    Montori, Victor M.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [48] Implementation suggestions for shared decision-making: results from a comparative study of inpatients and outpatients experience surveys
    Tian, Cindy Yue
    Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
    Qiu, Hong
    Liu, Shimeng
    Wang, Kailu
    Wei, Yan
    Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling
    Chen, Yingyao
    Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [49] Lessons learned by (from?) an economist working in medical decision making
    Wakker, Peter P.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (05) : 690 - 698
  • [50] Influence of Meta-Information on Decision-Making: Lessons Learned from Four Case Studies
    Riveiro, Maria
    Hdildin, Tow
    Falkman, Goran
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INTER-DISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE METHODS IN SITUATION AWARENESS AND DECISION SUPPORT (COGSIMA), 2014, : 14 - 20