共 50 条
Research priorities in regional anaesthesia: an international Delphi study
被引:6
|作者:
Ferry, Jenny
[1
]
Lewis, Owen
[1
]
Lloyd, James
[1
]
El-Boghdadly, Kariem
[2
,3
]
Kearns, Rachel
[4
,5
]
Albrecht, Eric
[6
,7
]
Altermatt, Fernando
[8
]
Ashokka, Balakrishnan
[9
]
Ayad, Amany E.
[10
]
Aziz, Ezzat S.
[10
]
Aziz, Lutful
[11
]
Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian
[12
]
Bouarroudj, Noreddine
[13
]
Chin, Ki Jinn
[14
,15
]
Delbos, Alain
[16
]
de Gracia, Alex
[17
]
Ip, Vivian H. Y.
[18
]
Kwofie, Kwesi
[19
]
Layera, Sebastian
[20
]
Lobo, Clara A.
[21
]
Mohammed, Mohammed
[22
]
Moka, Eleni
[23
]
Moreno, Milena
[24
,25
]
Morgan, Bethan
[26
]
Polela, Arthur
[27
]
Rahimzadeh, Poupak
[28
]
Tangwiwat, Suwimon
[29
]
Uppal, Vishal
[19
]
Perez, Marcelo Vaz
[30
]
Volk, Thomas
[31
,32
]
Wong, Patrick B. Y.
[33
]
Bowness, James S.
[1
,34
]
Macfarlane, Alan J. R.
[4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Aneurin Bevan Univ Hlth Board, Dept Anaesthesia, Newport, Wales
[2] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperat Med, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Ctr Human & Appl Physiol Sci, London, England
[4] Glasgow RoyalInfirmary, Dept Anaesthesia, Glasgow, Scotland
[5] Univ Glasgow, Sch Med Dent & Nursing, Glasgow, Scotland
[6] Univ Hosp Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[7] Univ Lausanne, Dept Anaesthesia, Lausanne, Switzerland
[8] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Escuela Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Santiago, Chile
[9] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Singapore, Singapore
[10] Cairo Univ, Dept Anesthesia ICU & Pain, Cairo, Egypt
[11] Evercare Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Med, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[12] Ganga Med Ctr & Hosp, Coimbatore, India
[13] Clin Maissalyne Constantine, Constantine, Algeria
[14] Univ Toronto, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[15] Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[16] Medipole Garonne, Dept Anesthesia, Toulouse, France
[17] Hosp Rafael Estevez, Caja Seguro Social, Aguadulce, Panama
[18] Univ Alberta Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[19] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Anesthesia Pain Management & Perioperat Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
[20] Univ Chile, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Santiago, Chile
[21] Cleveland Clin Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[22] North Cumbria Univ Hosp, Carlisle, England
[23] Hellenic Healthcare Grp HHG, Creta Inter Clin Hosp, Iraklion, Crete, Greece
[24] Pontifical Xavierian Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol, Bogota, Colombia
[25] Hosp Univ San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia
[26] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Wythenshawe Hosp, Manchester, England
[27] Levy Mwanawasa Univ Teaching Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care, Lusaka, Zambia
[28] Iran Univ Med Sci, Pain Res Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Tehran, Iran
[29] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[30] Fac Ciencias Med Santa Casa de Sao Paulo, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Therapy, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[31] Saarland Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Therapy, Med Ctr, Homburg, Germany
[32] Saarland Univ, Fac Med, Homburg, Germany
[33] Univ Ottawa, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[34] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Clin Neurosci, Oxford, England
关键词:
pain management;
priority setting;
regional anaesthesia;
research;
training and assessment;
BLOCK;
PAIN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.bja.2024.01.033
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
Background: Regional anaesthesia use is growing worldwide, and there is an increasing emphasis on research in regional anaesthesia to improve patient outcomes. However, priorities for future study remain unclear. We therefore conducted an international research prioritisation exercise, setting the agenda for future investigators and funding bodies. Methods: We invited members of specialist regional anaesthesia societies from six continents to propose research questions that they felt were unanswered. These were consolidated into representative indicative questions, and a literature review was undertaken to determine if any indicative questions were already answered by published work. Unanswered indicative questions entered a three-round modified Delphi process, whereby 29 experts in regional anaesthesia (representing all participating specialist societies) rated each indicative question for inclusion on a final high priority shortlist. If >= 75% of participants rated an indicative question as 'definitely' include in any round, it was accepted. Indicative questions rated as 'definitely' or 'probably' by < 50% of participants in any round were excluded. Retained indicative questions were further ranked based on the rating score in the final Delphi round. The final research priorities were ratified by the Delphi expert group. Results: There were 1318 responses from 516 people in the initial survey, from which 71 indicative questions were formed, of which 68 entered the modified Delphi process. Eleven 'highest priority' research questions were short listed, covering themes of pain management; training and assessment; clinical practice and efficacy; technology and equipment. Conclusions: We prioritised unanswered research questions in regional anaesthesia. These will inform a coordinated global research strategy for regional anaesthesia and direct investigators to address high-priority areas.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1048
页数:8
相关论文