The anomaly of the CMB power with the latest Planck data

被引:1
|
作者
Billi, M. [1 ,2 ]
Barreiro, R. B. [1 ]
Martinez-Gonzalez, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC Univ Cantabria, Inst Fis Cantabria, Ave Castros S-N, Santander 39005, Spain
[2] Ist Nazl Astrofis Osservatorio Astrofis & Sci Spa, Via Gobetti 101, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS | 2024年 / 07期
关键词
CMBR polarisation; Frequentist statistics; Statistical sampling techniques; CMBR theory; ANISOTROPY; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/080
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The lack of power anomaly is an unexpected feature observed at large angular scales in the maps of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) produced by the COBE, WMAP and Planck satellites. This signature, which consists in a missing of power with respect to that predicted by the Lambda CDM model, might hint at a new cosmological phase before the standard inflationary era. The main point of this paper is taking into account the latest Planck polarisation data to investigate how the CMB polarisation improves the understanding of this feature. With this aim, we apply to the latest Planck data, both PR3 (2018) and PR4 (2020) releases, a new class of estimators capable of evaluating this anomaly by considering temperature and polarisation data both separately and in a jointly way. This is the first time that the PR4 dataset has been used to study this anomaly. To critically evaluate this feature, taking into account the residuals of known systematic effects present in the Planck datasets, we analyse the cleaned CMB maps using different combinations of sky masks, harmonic range and binning on the CMB multipoles. Our analysis shows that the estimator based only on temperature data confirms the presence of a lack of power with a lower-tail-probability (LTP), depending on the component separation method, <= 0.33% and <= 1.76% for PR3 and PR4, respectively. To our knowledge, the LTP <= 0.33% for the PR3 dataset is the lowest one present in the literature obtained from Planck 2018 data, considering the Planck confidence mask. We find significant differences between these two datasets when polarisation is taken into account most likely due to a different level of systematics. Especially, the analysis with PR3 data, unlike that with PR4, seems to point towards a lack of power at large scales also for polarisation. Moreover, we also show that for the PR3 dataset the inclusion of the subdominant polarisation information provides estimates that are less likely accepted in a.CDM cosmological model than the only-temperature analysis over the entire harmonic-range considered. In particular, at l(max) = 26, we found that no simulation has a value as low as the data for all the pipelines.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Searching for primordial non-Gaussianity in Planck CMB maps using a combined estimator
    Novaes, C. P.
    Bernui, A.
    Ferreira, I. S.
    Wuensche, C. A.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2014, (01):
  • [42] Planck data and ultralight axions
    Csaki, Csaba
    Kaloper, Nemanja
    Terning, John
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, (06):
  • [43] Constraints on cosmological birefringence energy dependence from CMB polarization data
    Gubitosi, G.
    Paci, F.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2013, (02):
  • [44] Bayesian estimation of our local motion from the Planck-2018 CMB temperature map
    Saha, Sayan
    Shaikh, Shabbir
    Mukherjee, Suvodip
    Souradeep, Tarun
    Wandelt, Benjamin D.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2021, (10):
  • [45] Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove
    Aghanim, N.
    Armitage-Caplan, C.
    Arnaud, M.
    Ashdown, M.
    Atrio-Barandela, F.
    Aumont, J.
    Baccigalupi, C.
    Banday, A. J.
    Barreiro, R. B.
    Bartlett, J. G.
    Benabed, K.
    Benoit-Levy, A.
    Bernard, J. -P.
    Bersanelli, M.
    Bielewicz, P.
    Bobin, J.
    Bock, J. J.
    Bond, J. R.
    Borrill, J.
    Bouchet, F. R.
    Bridges, M.
    Burigana, C.
    Butler, R. C.
    Cardoso, J. -F.
    Catalano, A.
    Challinor, A.
    Chamballu, A.
    Chiang, H. C.
    Chiang, L. -Y
    Christensen, P. R.
    Clements, D. L.
    Colombo, L. P. L.
    Couchot, F.
    Crill, B. P.
    Curto, A.
    Cuttaia, F.
    Danese, L.
    Davies, R. D.
    Davis, R. J.
    de Bernardis, P.
    de Rosa, A.
    de Zotti, G.
    Delabrouille, J.
    Diego, J. M.
    Donzelli, S.
    Dore, O.
    Dupac, X.
    Efstathiou, G.
    Ensslin, T. A.
    Eriksen, H. K.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2014, 571
  • [46] Properties and use of CMB power spectrum likelihoods
    Hamimeche, Samira
    Lewis, Antony
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2009, 79 (08):
  • [47] Reconstructing the primordial power spectrum from the CMB
    Gauthier, Christopher
    Bucher, Martin
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2012, (10):
  • [48] B-mode power spectrum of CMB via polarized Compton scattering
    Khodagholizadeh, Jafar
    Mohammadi, Rohoollah
    Sadegh, Mahdi
    Vahedi, Ali
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2020, (01):
  • [49] Unraveling the CMB lack-of-correlation anomaly with the cosmological gravitational wave background
    Galloni, Giacomo
    Ballardini, Mario
    Bartolo, Nicola
    Gruppuso, Alessandro
    Pagano, Luca
    Ricciardone, Angelo
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2023, (10):
  • [50] Power spectra of CMB polarization by scattering in clusters
    Shimon, M.
    Rephaeli, Y.
    Sadeh, S.
    Keating, B.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 399 (04) : 2088 - 2098