The anomaly of the CMB power with the latest Planck data

被引:1
|
作者
Billi, M. [1 ,2 ]
Barreiro, R. B. [1 ]
Martinez-Gonzalez, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC Univ Cantabria, Inst Fis Cantabria, Ave Castros S-N, Santander 39005, Spain
[2] Ist Nazl Astrofis Osservatorio Astrofis & Sci Spa, Via Gobetti 101, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS | 2024年 / 07期
关键词
CMBR polarisation; Frequentist statistics; Statistical sampling techniques; CMBR theory; ANISOTROPY; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/080
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The lack of power anomaly is an unexpected feature observed at large angular scales in the maps of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) produced by the COBE, WMAP and Planck satellites. This signature, which consists in a missing of power with respect to that predicted by the Lambda CDM model, might hint at a new cosmological phase before the standard inflationary era. The main point of this paper is taking into account the latest Planck polarisation data to investigate how the CMB polarisation improves the understanding of this feature. With this aim, we apply to the latest Planck data, both PR3 (2018) and PR4 (2020) releases, a new class of estimators capable of evaluating this anomaly by considering temperature and polarisation data both separately and in a jointly way. This is the first time that the PR4 dataset has been used to study this anomaly. To critically evaluate this feature, taking into account the residuals of known systematic effects present in the Planck datasets, we analyse the cleaned CMB maps using different combinations of sky masks, harmonic range and binning on the CMB multipoles. Our analysis shows that the estimator based only on temperature data confirms the presence of a lack of power with a lower-tail-probability (LTP), depending on the component separation method, <= 0.33% and <= 1.76% for PR3 and PR4, respectively. To our knowledge, the LTP <= 0.33% for the PR3 dataset is the lowest one present in the literature obtained from Planck 2018 data, considering the Planck confidence mask. We find significant differences between these two datasets when polarisation is taken into account most likely due to a different level of systematics. Especially, the analysis with PR3 data, unlike that with PR4, seems to point towards a lack of power at large scales also for polarisation. Moreover, we also show that for the PR3 dataset the inclusion of the subdominant polarisation information provides estimates that are less likely accepted in a.CDM cosmological model than the only-temperature analysis over the entire harmonic-range considered. In particular, at l(max) = 26, we found that no simulation has a value as low as the data for all the pipelines.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the significance of power asymmetries in Planck CMB data at all scales
    Quartin, Miguel
    Notari, Alessio
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, (01):
  • [2] Consistency of the Planck CMB data and ACDM cosmology
    Shafieloo, Arman
    Hazra, Dhiraj Kumar
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2017, (04):
  • [3] Reconstruction of a direction-dependent primordial power spectrum from Planck CMB data
    Durakovic, Amel
    Hunt, Paul
    Mukherjee, Suvodip
    Sarkar, Subir
    Souradeep, Tarun
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2018, (02):
  • [4] Excess of lensing amplitude in the Planck CMB power spectrum
    Mokeddem, Rahima
    Hipolito-Ricaldi, Wiliam S.
    Bernui, Armando
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2023, (01):
  • [5] A constraint on Planck-scale modifications to electrodynamics with CMB polarization data
    Gubitosi, Giulia
    Pagano, Luca
    Amelino-Camelia, Giovanni
    Melchiorri, Alessandro
    Cooray, Asantha
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2009, (08):
  • [6] Is the lack of power anomaly in the CMB correlated with the orientation of the Galactic plane?
    Natale, U.
    Gruppuso, A.
    Molinari, D.
    Natoli, P.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2019, (12):
  • [7] Constraining CMB physical processes using Planck 2018 data
    Ruiz-Granda, M.
    Vielva, P.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2022, (11):
  • [8] Multitracer CMB delensing maps from Planck and WISE data
    Yu, Byeonghee
    Hill, J. Colin
    Sherwin, Blake D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2017, 96 (12)
  • [9] Planck constraints on cosmic birefringence and its cross-correlation with the CMB
    Zagatti, G.
    Bortolami, M.
    Gruppuso, A.
    Natoli, P.
    Pagano, L.
    Fabbian, G.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2024, (05):
  • [10] Using CMB data to constrain non-isotropic Planck-scale modifications to Electrodynamics
    Gubitosi, Giulia
    Migliaccio, Marina
    Pagano, Luca
    Amelino-Camelia, Giovanni
    Melchiorri, Alessandro
    Natoli, Paolo
    Polenta, Gianluca
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2011, (11):