UAV path planning techniques: a survey

被引:2
作者
Ghambari, Soheila [1 ]
Golabi, Mahmoud [1 ]
Jourdan, Laetitia [2 ]
Lepagnot, Julien [1 ]
Idoumghar, Lhassane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haute Alsace, IRIMAS, UR 7499, F-68100 Mulhouse, France
[2] Univ Lille, CNRS, Cent Lille, UMR 9189,CRIStAL, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词
UAVs; path planning techniques; offline and online; classical methods; soft-computing approaches; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; AUTONOMOUS UAV; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; TRAJECTORY TRACKING; CONFIGURATION-SPACE; GENETIC ALGORITHM; VORONOI DIAGRAM; ACO ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1051/ro/2024073
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are ideally suited for many real-world applications ranging from scientific to commercial, industrial, and military fields. Enhancing the efficiency of UAV-based missions through optimization techniques is of paramount significance. In this regard, the path planning problem that refers to finding the best collision-free path between the start point and the destination by addressing temporal, physical, and geometric constraints is a key issue. In this paper, a review of recent path planning methods from different perspectives with a clear and comprehensive categorization is presented. This study provides a general taxonomy categorizing the existing works into classical approaches, soft-computing techniques, and hybrid methods. Here, a detailed analysis of the recent techniques as well as their advantages and limitations is offered. Additionally, it provides an overview of environment modeling methods, path structures, optimality criteria, completeness criteria, and current UAV simulators.
引用
收藏
页码:2951 / 2989
页数:39
相关论文
共 345 条
  • [1] A comparative review on mobile robot path planning: Classical or meta-heuristic methods?
    Ab Wahab, Mohd Nadhir
    Nefti-Meziani, Samia
    Atyabi, Adham
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2020, 50 : 233 - 252
  • [2] Abichandani P., 2013, Found. Trends Rob, V2, P261
  • [3] Adolf F., 2007, IFAC Proc., V40, P264, DOI [10.3182/20070903-3-FR-2921.00046, DOI 10.3182/20070903-3-FR-2921.00046]
  • [4] Path planning techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: A review, solutions, and challenges
    Aggarwal, Shubhani
    Kumar, Neeraj
    [J]. COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 149 : 270 - 299
  • [5] RRT* GL Based Optimal Path Planning for Real-Time Navigation of UAVs
    Aguilar, Wilbert G.
    Morales, Stephanie
    Ruiz, Hugo
    Abad, Vanessa
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, IWANN 2017, PT II, 2017, 10306 : 585 - 595
  • [6] Efficient Energy Flight Path Planning Algorithm Using 3-D Visibility Roadmap for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
    Ahmad, Zahoor
    Ullah, Farman
    Tran, Cong
    Lee, Sungchang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017
  • [7] Airbus, 2022, Zephyr: the first stratospheric uas of its kind
  • [8] Alejo D, 2013, INT CONF UNMAN AIRCR, P298
  • [9] Alexis K., RotorS simulator
  • [10] Cooperative Path Planning of Multiple UAVs by using Max-Min Ant Colony Optimization along with Cauchy Mutant Operator
    Ali, Zain Anwar
    Han Zhangang
    Hang, Wang Bo
    [J]. FLUCTUATION AND NOISE LETTERS, 2021, 20 (01):